19.07.2013 Views

Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide

Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide

Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WAN Edge Classification and Provisioning Models<br />

3-10<br />

<strong>Enterprise</strong> <strong>QoS</strong> <strong>Solution</strong> <strong>Reference</strong> <strong>Network</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Chapter 3 WAN Aggregator <strong>QoS</strong> <strong>Design</strong><br />

class Critical Data<br />

bandwidth percent 36 ! Critical Data class gets 36% BW guarantee<br />

random-detect dscp-based ! Enables DSCP-WRED for Critical-Data class<br />

class Scavenger<br />

bandwidth percent 1 ! Scavenger class is throttled<br />

class class-default<br />

bandwidth percent 25 ! Default class gets a 25% BW guarantee<br />

random-detect ! Enables WRED for class-default<br />

!<br />

Verification command:<br />

show policy<br />

High Link Speed <strong>QoS</strong> Class Models<br />

High-speed links (such as multiple T1/E1 or above speeds) allow for the provisioning of Voice,<br />

Interactive-Video, and multiple classes of data, according to the design rules presented in this chapter<br />

(for example, 25 percent for Best Effort class and < 33 percent for all LLQs).<br />

Enabling <strong>QoS</strong> only optimizes the efficiency of bandwidth utilization; it does not create bandwidth.<br />

Therefore, it is important to have adequate bandwidth for all the applications being provisioned.<br />

Furthermore, as WAN bandwidth is becoming less expensive, higher-speed links are becoming more<br />

popular.<br />

Even if adequate bandwidth exists for up to 11 classes of traffic, as outlined by the <strong>QoS</strong> Baseline Model,<br />

not all enterprises are comfortable with deploying such complex <strong>QoS</strong> policies at this time. Therefore, it<br />

is recommended to start simple, but with room to grow into more complex models. Figure 13-4 illustrates<br />

a simple migration strategy showing which classes are good candidates for subdivision into more<br />

granular classes as future needs arise.<br />

Figure 3-4 Number of <strong>QoS</strong> Classes Migration Strategy Example<br />

Five-Class Model<br />

Real-Time<br />

Call-Signaling<br />

Critical Data<br />

Best-Effort<br />

Scavenger<br />

Eight-Class Model<br />

Voice<br />

Video<br />

Call-Signaling<br />

<strong>Network</strong>-Control<br />

Critical Data<br />

Bulk Data<br />

Best-Effort<br />

Scavenger<br />

<strong>QoS</strong> Baseline Model<br />

If the enterprises’ <strong>QoS</strong> requirements exceed that which the Five-Class Model can provision for (such as<br />

requiring service guarantees for Interactive-Video and requiring Bulk Data to be controlled during busy<br />

periods), they might consider migrating to the Eight-Class Model.<br />

Voice<br />

Interactive-Video<br />

Streaming-Video<br />

Call-Signaling<br />

IP Routing<br />

<strong>Network</strong>-Management<br />

Mission-Critical Data<br />

Transactional Data<br />

Bulk Data<br />

Best-Effort<br />

Scavenger<br />

Version 3.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!