19.07.2013 Views

Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide

Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide

Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 Campus <strong>QoS</strong> <strong>Design</strong><br />

Version 3.3<br />

Catalyst 6500 PFC2/PFC3—<strong>QoS</strong> Considerations and <strong>Design</strong><br />

Catalyst 6500—Untrusted Server with Scavenger-Class <strong>QoS</strong> Model<br />

This section includes the following topics:<br />

Configuration<br />

Catalyst 6500 CatOS <strong>QoS</strong> Verification Commands<br />

Additional flexibility is offered to the Untrusted Server + Scavenger Model due to the Catalyst 6500<br />

PFC2/PFC3’s support of Dual-Rate Policing (as described in RFC 2698 “A Two Rate Three Color<br />

Marker” and as illustrated in Figure 4-5).<br />

Using a Dual-Rate policer, three colors are used to indicate:<br />

Conforming traffic (within the normal rate)<br />

Excess traffic (exceeding the normal rate but less than the excess rate)<br />

Violating traffic (exceeding both the normal and excess rate)<br />

The Dual-Rate policer is intended to complement the RFC 2597 Assured Forwarding Groups Diff-Serv<br />

marking scheme. To illustrate, consider Transactional Data traffic, which is marked to AF Class 2.<br />

Conforming Transactional Data should be marked to AF21, Excess Transactional Data traffic should be<br />

marked-down to AF22, and Violating Transactional Data traffic should be marked-down further to AF23.<br />

Such a markdown scheme is intended to be complemented further by DSCP-based WRED congestion<br />

avoidance. In this manner, in the event of congestion, AF23 is dropped more aggressively than AF22<br />

which, in turn, is dropped more aggressively than AF21.<br />

However, since Catalyst 6500 queuing and congestion-avoidance is determined primary by CoS<br />

markings, the standards-based DSCP model cannot be followed completely at this time on this platform<br />

(since AF21/AF22/AF23 all share CoS 3, this does not allow for granular sub-class <strong>QoS</strong>). Therefore, the<br />

use of Scavenger class markings for violating traffic could be used to achieve a similar overall effect,<br />

while maintaining consistency with <strong>QoS</strong> designs previously presented for other Catalyst platforms.<br />

Under such a modified Untrusted Multi-Application Server with Scavenger-Class <strong>QoS</strong> Model, Excess<br />

Transactional Data traffic can be marked down to AF22 and Violating Transactional Data traffic can be<br />

marked down to DSCP CS1 (Scavenger). Similarly, Excess Bulk Data traffic can be marked down to<br />

AF12 and Violating Bulk Data traffic can be marked down to DSCP CS1 (Scavenger). This modified<br />

model is shown in Figure 2-24.<br />

<strong>Enterprise</strong> <strong>QoS</strong> <strong>Solution</strong> <strong>Reference</strong> <strong>Network</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

2-91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!