18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with misconceptions. The primary issues are machine construction, current control, and “torque<br />

ripple,” with secondary issues being efficiency, “harmonics,” and audible noise. While some<br />

references are weakly worded (as if the authors are uncertain of their claims), it is not difficult to<br />

find sources with clear wording from both extremes of each issue. For example, “there is<br />

absolutely no difference between sine and trap motors,” and “sine and trap motors are entirely<br />

different machines.” Or, “sine and trap machines require different types of current commutation,”<br />

versus “either motor may be driven by similar means.” Or, “motor and drive types may be<br />

mixed,” versus “mixing motor and control types may cause serious issues.” Without field<br />

experience it is difficult to determine the truth regarding each issue. The largest difficulty seems<br />

to be that the amount of popular literature exceeds the amount of academic literature (concerning<br />

this issue). The author has found that although there are excellent resources to help a newcomer<br />

distinguish the difference, it takes a steady research effort to locate these resources, it takes time<br />

to work through and comprehend these resources, and it is very difficult to “unlearn” solid<br />

misconceptions. Some references include [68], [69], [63], [65], [76].<br />

The author’s understanding is summarized here. Sine and trap motors may be constructed a<br />

number of different ways but as far as torque production and bEMF generation is concerned, the<br />

motors differ only in the shape of the rotor-stator flux linkage. This difference can be created by<br />

changing the way the winding is distributed in the stator slots, by adjusting the magnetic design<br />

(airgap and tooth/slot dimensions), by adjusting the construction of the rotor and physical shape<br />

of the rotor magnets, and by adjusting the magnetization profile of the magnets [68], [69]. As<br />

shown earlier, the bEMF/torque function is the derivative of the rotor-stator flux linkage with<br />

respect to rotor position and in the general case torque is produced as shown in Figure 2.28 and<br />

Equation (2.54). It is clear that the fundamental mechanism by which torque is produced is<br />

identical regardless of the type of motor. If a motor can be categorized as trap or sine—and ideal<br />

drive currents are forced into it—the motor will produce “ideal” torque. There is much<br />

misinformation about the possibility or impossibility of driving a motor with non ideal current<br />

waveforms. Quite simply, either type of motor (or any arbitrary motor not fitting either<br />

classification) can be driven by any arbitrary current waveform. The torque produced in each case<br />

will be different, the efficiency will be affected, and the performance of the current controller will<br />

be affected; these issues will be discussed later.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!