18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

d<br />

R( r) ke( r) kt( r) sin( r)<br />

(2.52)<br />

d r<br />

To recapitulate, the torque and bEMF were previously found via the BLi and BLv laws,<br />

respectively. Then the rotor-stator flux linkage was derived (Equations 2.43-2.44) and its position<br />

derivative was computed (Equation 2.49). By comparing the former expressions for torque and<br />

bEMF it was seen that they could be rewritten in terms of the position derivative of rotor-stator<br />

flux linkage (Equations 2.50 and 2.51). These two derivations demonstrate the two common<br />

perspectives from which we usually think about motor operation. The BLi and BLv laws focus on<br />

the conductors (of the coilsides) and how much flux they “cut” as the rotor moves, whereas use of<br />

the flux linkage focuses on the entire winding. Obviously both interpretations are useful but it is<br />

the flux linkage method that is most used in modern analysis (and thus, in this report).<br />

That Equations (2.32) and (2.37) are identical to Equations (2.50) and (2.51) (with Equation 2.52)<br />

is not a coincidence. When the circuit model was developed earlier, the bEMF was given in<br />

Equation (2.25) as the time derivative of the rotor-stator flux linkage R , which was left general<br />

at that stage in the development. Now that we have found an expression for R in a sine motor<br />

(Equation 2.44), Faraday’s law can be invoked to yield Equation (2.53).<br />

d<br />

et () R( r())<br />

t<br />

dt<br />

<br />

R( r) dr<br />

<br />

<br />

dt<br />

r<br />

d<br />

( )<br />

<br />

(2.53)<br />

d<br />

() R r<br />

et<br />

r<br />

Equation (2.53) is seen to be identical to Equation (2.51). This shows that the latter is valid and is<br />

just a restatement of Faraday’s law. Similarly, Equation (2.50) is simply a restatement of another<br />

result (although there is no associated surname). For the nonsalient machines considered here,<br />

Equation (2.50) is the same as the torque determined by taking the partial derivative with respect<br />

to rotor position of the energy (flux held constant) or of the coenergy (current held constant)<br />

stored in the magnetic circuit [68, pp.59-60], [69, p.5.36]. The topic of stored energy and<br />

coenergy is useful to study but is far beyond scope; it can be found in many older machine texts<br />

such as [27], [42], [26], [38]. Aside from highlighting the duality between torque and bEMF that<br />

we have come to expect, this derivation shows how each is related to the rotor-stator flux linkage,<br />

which is a key idea in the SV model.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!