18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eluctance for compatibility with the derivation but it is known as the internal or leakage<br />

permeance of the magnet [69, p.4.12]. The flux shown in Figure 2.14 corresponds to the flux path<br />

in the center of Figure 2.13.<br />

Figure 2.14 – Magnetic circuit of Figure 2.12.<br />

The two magnets can be combined ( R 2R<br />

) and the two airgap reluctances can be combined<br />

m m<br />

as R 2 Rag<br />

. Per the assumptions given earlier the rotor and stator reluctances are ignored. The<br />

reduction yields the circuit shown in Figure 2.15.<br />

Figure 2.15 – Simplified magnetic circuit of Figure 2.12.<br />

The flux linking the turns of the coil is from two sources: the coil ( C ) and the permanent<br />

magnet ( M ). Ignoring hysteresis, superposition applies and the total flux ( T ) is given by<br />

Equation (2.14). Since leakage flux is ignored here, this total flux crosses the airgap, thus it could<br />

be called the airgap flux.<br />

<br />

(2.14)<br />

T<br />

C<br />

M<br />

C and M are found by standard circuit analysis techniques using the circuits shown in Figure<br />

2.16Figure 2.16 and are given by Equation (2.15) and Equation (2.16).<br />

N i<br />

C <br />

R R<br />

(2.15)<br />

m<br />

R<br />

m<br />

M r<br />

(2.16)<br />

R Rm<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!