18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clarke & αβ0 Transforms<br />

The matrix transformations used in electrical circuit and machine analysis ([32], [34], [22], [35])<br />

have evolved over the years, becoming rearranged, scaled, expanded, reduced, and reordered to<br />

serve various purposes; in the process they also acquire various names. The Clarke, Park, and<br />

MSC transformations given in this report are just one particular form of each. To compare the<br />

various versions is important for several reasons: to understand the significance of the ZS (0)<br />

term, to get an idea of the varieties in use, and to understand that there are so many variants that<br />

one should never take a sentence at its word—such as, “the Park transform accomplishes…”—<br />

until the matrix transformation in question is verified. This section examines the Clarke and αβ0<br />

transforms; the “Park,” “original Park,” and dq0 transforms are investigated in Appendix E.<br />

The primary difference between the Clarke and αβ0 transforms is the presence or absence of the<br />

ZS component. It has been shown numerous times that the SV transform is the complex-valued<br />

version of the Clarke transform, and that neither can contain the ZS component. This is very<br />

much worth a closer look. In the simplest case when we know the ABC components do not<br />

contain a ZS component (such as the measurement of currents in a wye connection with isolated<br />

neutral), we are free to not have to calculate it, as in Equation (D.26). This is the “raw” Clarke<br />

transformation matrix defined in Chapter 3. It is sometimes called a phase transformation matrix,<br />

which is a fitting name because it implies a stationary transform that effectively functions as a 3to-2-phase<br />

“Scott-T” transformer connection.<br />

x A <br />

x 1 1/2 1/2<br />

<br />

k<br />

<br />

x<br />

<br />

B<br />

x<br />

<br />

0 3/2 3/2 <br />

x C <br />

(D.26)<br />

We previously acknowledged that since 0 it would be more convenient if we made that<br />

simplification in order to obtain more direct relationships between the components. Rearranging<br />

the 0 condition and substituting gives the form of either Equation (D.27) or (D.28).<br />

x A <br />

x 3/2 0 0<br />

<br />

k<br />

<br />

x<br />

<br />

B<br />

x<br />

<br />

0 3/2 3/2 <br />

x C <br />

x A <br />

x 3/2 0 0<br />

<br />

k<br />

<br />

x<br />

<br />

B<br />

x<br />

<br />

3/2 3 0 <br />

x C <br />

(D.27)<br />

(D.28)<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!