18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In summary, the CFP winding produces a squarewave MMF with the largest possible amplitude<br />

of all harmonics. Distributing the winding away from the CFP case will reduce the harmonic<br />

content. Different winding configurations will decrease each harmonic by different amounts. The<br />

amount of reduction of each harmonic is indicated by the winding factor for that harmonic, thus<br />

there is a set of harmonic winding factors associated with each winding. The CFP winding<br />

produces the most harmonics; the sinusoidal winding produces the least harmonics. In the ideal<br />

case only the fundamental of MMF is produced but it comes at a cost of reduction in amplitude.<br />

This concept is summarized in Figure C.11.<br />

Figure C.11 – Summary of MMF Fourier series amplitudes.<br />

Rotor-Stator Flux Linkage<br />

Proceeding according to Figure C.1, this section discusses the interaction of the rotor flux with<br />

the winding distribution. In examining the stator MMF it was found that the CFP and sinusoidal<br />

windings are the two natural extrema—the former produces a squarewave with maximum<br />

harmonic content and the latter produces a sinewave. Any winding in between those two can be<br />

analyzed using harmonic winding factors. A similar approach could be taken in discussing rotors<br />

except the situation is more complicated because in addition to the range of windings discussed<br />

we can have a range of rotor flux profiles. A reasonable approach would be to study the CFP and<br />

292

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!