18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The number of closed-loop schemes is large. The methods differ primarily in the type of<br />

estimator and the type of correction used, although there are variations as to which signals are<br />

measured. A sizeable portion of the literature concerns the sensorless control of induction<br />

machines, which is a technical challenge that is very different in nature than the sensorless control<br />

of a BPMS motor. Due to different terminology in use is at times difficult to identify which type<br />

of estimator is used. For example, some references state a Luenberger observer is a structure<br />

applicable to only linear systems while other references claim otherwise. A full-order linear<br />

observer may be called a Luenberger observer, while a reduced-order linear observer may be<br />

called a Gopinath observer; another reference will reverse the names. Often an “extended”<br />

Luenberger observer is mentioned but the author has yet to find the subject treated in a control<br />

system text. Further, there are different structures identified as “extended” Luenberger or Kalman<br />

filters (ELO and EKF)—an EKF in one reference may simply estimate states, while an EKF in<br />

another reference may be used for simultaneous state estimation and parameter identification. In<br />

addition to the large variation in terminology and structure of the “simple” linear Luenberger and<br />

Kalman filters (and their extended varieties), nonlinear observers are reported, as is nonlinear<br />

compensation of a linear observer. It is also popular to combine adaptive schemes with the<br />

observers; there are simply too many possibilities to categorize.<br />

A cursory examination of the literature on sensorless control will reveal that much of it requires a<br />

graduate- or post-graduate understanding of mathematical control theory to understand the<br />

operation of the system. Even if one had such training, conducting a literature review would be a<br />

formidable task. According to [93], “…for the two year period 2005-2006 over 120 papers<br />

featuring [sensorless control] were published in IEEE Transactions and Institution of Engineering<br />

and Technology Proceedings alone.” Even if one were to read and comprehend all of them, it is<br />

difficult to make any performance comparisons because the different schemes are not evaluated<br />

according to a standard (though some have recently been proposed) [93]. For these reasons and<br />

others, this report presents only a simple linearized Luenberger-style observer (closed-loop, full<br />

order).<br />

Luenberger Observer<br />

The sensorless scheme just presented was given as a set of equations that could be solved<br />

numerically in software. Another popular alternative is to utilize the state-space form. In this<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!