18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

From the summary above, it can be understood that the history of motor control spans more than<br />

a century and is very multifaceted. To understand where the material in this report fits into the<br />

overall picture, some points should be summarized. The realization of AC motor control via the<br />

generation of variable voltage and frequency current (using solid-state devices) was a landmark<br />

achievement. This was followed by the development of power devices that could be turned off at<br />

will, which allowed PWM to become a reality. In the beginning this was used to create VVVF<br />

induction motor drives. At some time, a line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor was<br />

introduced but it was not used in variable-frequency applications. In addition, an electronicallycommutated<br />

(thus brushless) permanent magnet machine was devised. Eventually the concept of<br />

a sinusoidal permanent magnet synchronous machine was combined with an inverter to yield an<br />

adjustable-speed AC drive without brushes, capable of servo-like performance. The electronically<br />

commutated motor also served in this capacity, with the distinct advantages of using less<br />

expensive shaft position sensors and power electronics; due to the lower cost and simplicity of the<br />

system, the technique is still used today. Separate from all of this, vector control allowed linear<br />

control over the torque produced by an induction motor; this eventually allowed the induction<br />

motor to be used in servo-like applications as well where it was previously not possible. The<br />

vector control scheme can be applied to other motors and it provides distinct benefits, but these<br />

benefits are not the same as those achieved with the induction motor. All methods of synchronous<br />

machine control and all methods of vector control (of any machine) require knowledge of the<br />

rotor flux, which can be obtained directly or indirectly from a shaft sensor. There are many<br />

benefits to eliminating the shaft sensor, yielding so-called sensorless control.<br />

The original purpose of the research that led to this report was to investigate the advantages and<br />

disadvantages of the sensorless FOC of a BPMS motor. This involved learning the fundamentals<br />

of brushless motor operation; since this is not taught in most curricula the initial sources of<br />

information were application notes written by servo motor and servo drive manufacturers, and by<br />

manufacturers of silicon devices (ASICs, MCUs, DSPs) involved in motor control. The motor<br />

drive literature was naturally lacking on the details of how the controls were implemented<br />

internally, and the silicon device literature was geared toward the implementation in a particular<br />

device and was lacking in theory. All of that literature would be useful for practical applications<br />

of the manufacturer’s product, but it is not useful to learn theory. In addition, this literature is<br />

very lacking in performance data. Manufacturers are quick to list benefits of using their products,<br />

but often these claims are misleading at best. This literature (as well as all articles in trade<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!