18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4.34 – SVM overmodulation region: locus of fundamental SV.<br />

Comparing Figure 4.33 and Figure 4.34 should finalize the understanding that the hexagon is the<br />

“maximum” volt-second output and the circle (F) is the maximum of the fundamental of the<br />

output (for both pole and line-neutral voltages).<br />

SVM Switching Schemes<br />

The previous subsection explained how SVM synthesized a time-averaged SV by switching<br />

between at least two active SVs and at least one null SV. Since those are the only basic<br />

requirements, there are many different ways to realize a SVM inverter. This section will develop<br />

one of the common methods in order to illustrate some of the details involved in SVM<br />

implementation. Perhaps the most intuitive switching scheme would be to divide the modulation<br />

period into three parts corresponding to two active and one null SV, as shown in Figure 4.35.<br />

During the time TX, X S<br />

<br />

would be asserted, and so on.<br />

Figure 4.35 – One period in a simple switching scheme.<br />

Similar to a single channel in a PWM inverter, the period consists of an ‘on’ segment (TX+TY)<br />

and an ‘off’ segment (TN). But instead of simply modulating a pulse width we are modulating the<br />

duration of a base SV, and there are two of them. There is a disadvantage to this simple scheme,<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!