18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

then there would be periods during which only one phase would be connected to the bus (which<br />

results in zero potential since the neutral of the load is isolated), so that is the minimum. Perhaps<br />

there are schemes with gating durations between the two but these are not common. Therefore, in<br />

the 120° inverter at least one transistor per leg must be controlled (full-on or PWM) over 120° of<br />

the electrical half-cycle; during the remaining 60° both transistors must be <strong>OF</strong>F. In the 180°<br />

inverter both transistors in each leg must be controlled (full-on or PWM) at all times. The gating<br />

periods for 120° and 180° inverters are shown in Figure 4.8. The shaded blocks show the periods<br />

during which either transistor in one phase leg is controlled. In the 120° inverter it is seen that<br />

there are two 60° segments per electrical cycle (360°) where both transistors in a leg are <strong>OF</strong>F.<br />

This is true for each phase and the <strong>OF</strong>F periods are staggered between the phases, thus there will<br />

always be exactly two phase legs controlled at any given time. In the 180° inverter it is clear that<br />

the transistors in each leg are controlled at all times, thus all three legs are controlled at all times.<br />

Due to finite transistor turn-off times a small delay (called dead-time or a blanking pulse) must be<br />

separate the transistor switching in one leg, as discussed later.<br />

Figure 4.8 – Gating schemes for 120° and 180° inverters.<br />

Inverter Control Methods<br />

The 120° and 180° inverters can be controlled in many different ways. As one reference puts it,<br />

“…the number and combination of permutations seem to be endless” [128]. In another, “…the<br />

enormous amount of material published makes it challenging for a user to identify basic<br />

modulation principles and apply them to particular implementations. Much reported research<br />

has presented “new” or “improved” PWM techniques, which are often only a straightforward<br />

variation of a previous approach. But it can at times be quite difficult to see how they are<br />

related” [70, p.95]. These quotations were referring to PWM methods in general, but the problem<br />

is compounded in motor control because of the commutation/phasing and PWM are often<br />

inseparable from one another. Only the PWM methods commonly used in BPMS motor control<br />

will be discussed here. These are presented not only to give some perspective on motor control<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!