18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In Equation (3.135) Z has elements identical to those of Z abc (eigenvalues are invariant under<br />

a linear transformation) but is only 2x2 (owing to the fact that we used the Clarke instead of αβ0<br />

transform). This result means that the three-phase circuit can be modeled as a two-phase<br />

equivalent with the same values for the impedance elements (unlike the three-phase circuits, these<br />

two-phase circuits are independent). Expanding the impedance matrix yields Equation (3.136).<br />

v Ri L i<br />

e<br />

(3.136)<br />

s <br />

By the relationship between matrix and SV representations (Equation 3.72), Equation (3.136) is<br />

equivalent to Equation (3.137).<br />

<br />

v Ri Lsi e<br />

(3.137)<br />

<br />

i ji SV diagram for an arbitrary lagging power<br />

Figure 3.41 shows the steady-state <br />

factor; the bEMF is used as the reference and the diagram is shown for t 0 . This is similar to<br />

the phasor diagram of Figure 3.17 and all of the relationships that held for the SPE analysis<br />

(Figure 3.19 to Figure 3.23) hold for the SV analysis as well, giving the same clear picture of how<br />

the physical quantities relate to the electrical quantities. But since the phasors are replaced with<br />

space vectors which are instantaneous quantities that represent the contribution of all phase<br />

variables, the SV model is valid for nonsinusoidal and transient conditions. The two diagrams are<br />

the same only because we assumed balanced sinusoidal conditions at steady state, because we<br />

chose e as the reference, and because we drew the diagram at t 0 . The alignment with the<br />

real axis actually has no meaning just as in phasor analysis—it simply shows the relationship<br />

between the SVs.<br />

Figure 3.41 – SV diagram of synchronous motor in stationary frame (steady state).<br />

In traditional analysis Equation (3.136) is used but its SV equivalent (Equation 3.137) is not used<br />

as often in SV analysis. Instead, the variant that incorporates the electromagnetic quantities is<br />

most common. Rewriting the stator flux linkage (as done in Chapter 2, in Appendix B, and in the<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!