18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As an example, find the SV that corresponds to unit-amplitude balanced sinusoidal<br />

quantities at an electrical position of zero. From Figure 3.6 or Equation (3.91), the values<br />

are given by Equation (3.96). Substituting them into the SV definition gives Equation<br />

(3.97), assuming k 1 for simplicity.<br />

x<br />

A 1<br />

<br />

xB<br />

1/2<br />

<br />

xC<br />

1/2<br />

3 j0<br />

3<br />

x e <br />

2 2<br />

(3.96)<br />

(3.97)<br />

Clearly the SV is aligned to the phase-A and α axes and the projection onto either is<br />

given by Equation (3.97). The scaling of 3/2 is present as expected. But obtaining the<br />

value of x A from Equation (3.85) gives<br />

2 23 xAx 1.<br />

This shows that the<br />

3 32 phase variables obtained using an inverse transform (such as Equation 3.85) are equal to<br />

the projected value reduced by a factor of 2/(3 k ) . The Clark transformation<br />

(equivalently, SV transformation) maps x abc to x thus any SV exists in the αβ plane or<br />

with scaling thus it makes sense that when we project back onto the phase axes we<br />

should have to reverse the scaling. The matrix in Equation (3.85) is the pseudoinverse of<br />

the Clarke transfomation matrix and it inherently scales the result back.<br />

The issue of scaling and the difference between projection and the inverse transformation is not<br />

treated well in the popular literature. In most cases the “inverse Clarke” transform is presented as<br />

nothing other than a projection of a SV or an algorithm. Understanding the true inverse<br />

transformation provides much needed insight, especially when working with modulation<br />

techniques based on space vectors. Although the inverse transformation is the more rigorous<br />

perspective, the projection perspective is obviously useful and is correct when scaled properly. In<br />

fact, further studying the projections will provide further insight into reference frame theory.<br />

Projections<br />

Projecting the SV onto the α axis is simple because the projection is given by the real part of the<br />

SV. The projection onto the phase-A axis is given by the same. Similarly, projection onto the β<br />

axis is given by the imaginary part of the SV. However, projection onto the phase-B and phase-C<br />

axes is not that simple because they are not perpendicular to the real or imaginary axes. There are<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!