18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

produced by an equivalent (Ne-turn) sinusoidally-distributed coil whose magnetic axis is aligned<br />

at the angular position of the current SV and driven by a current equal to the magnitude of the<br />

current SV.<br />

Figure 3.28 – Axis of rotating amp-turn distribution cophasal with current and MMF SVs.<br />

Torque production is of critical interest and torque production is directly related to the amplitudes<br />

and angular positions of the stator and rotor fields relative to one another, thus the stator MMF is<br />

of interest. Since the magnitude and angle of the stator MMF are directly related to the magnitude<br />

and angle of the current SV, even for arbitrary currents, it is clear that the current SV can be used<br />

to describe the torque of the machine; this will be developed in Part III.<br />

The take-away from this subsection is that each SV represents a cosinusoidal distribution relative<br />

to the phase-A axis. For the MMF SV this distribution coincides with the actual distribution in the<br />

machine but for all other quantities the “distribution” is an abstract concept described by<br />

reference frame theory and this is the connection between the physical phenomena in the machine<br />

and its SV representation. Surprisingly, most texts offer only a mathematical treatment and make<br />

no distinction between the physical distribution represented by the MMF SV and the abstract<br />

distributions represented by the SVs of transformed quantities. However, one text [73]—which<br />

attempts (and does well) to look beyond the mathematical definition—explicitly states that no<br />

attempt will be made in the book to assign a physical meaning to the SVs of transformed<br />

quantities, indicating that only the MMF distribution is represented by the SV. Nonetheless, the<br />

discussion in this report is a simplification of the full theory (which is not often used to its fullest<br />

extent) in which the SV analysis treats a distributed-parameter machine [103] instead of the<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!