18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(3.7):<br />

3 Ne<br />

<br />

f ( , t) Ipcos(<br />

t)<br />

2 2 <br />

At that time the argument of the cosine was briefly discussed and now we return to that<br />

discussion. It was shown that Equation (3.7) gives the traveling wave as expected, while<br />

Equations (3.6) is interpreted as giving the value of MMF at some observation point θ, as a<br />

function of time. In the simplest interpretation, taking the real part of Equation (3.49) yields<br />

Equation (3.6) for 0 .<br />

3 Ne jt 3<br />

Ne<br />

<br />

Re Ie p Ipcos( t), 0<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

Therefore, it can be interpreted that the real part of the MMF SV represents the value of MMF at<br />

the point of observation 0 , ensuring us that the MMF SV does indeed represent the<br />

cosinusoidal distribution even if the θ terms is not present. But this might then raise questions as<br />

to how Equation (3.6) represents a cosinusoidal distribution in θ without having θ in the<br />

argument, or how it can remain cosinusoidal even if the currents are not. Assume the currents do<br />

not form a balanced sinusoidal set, but let the angle of this arbitrary current SV be defined as <br />

as usual. Whatever it is, it will vary with time: () t . Substitution into Equation (3.6) and<br />

evaluating at 0 gives Equation (3.62).<br />

3 Ne<br />

<br />

f( , t) Ipcos<br />

( t)<br />

<br />

2 2 <br />

3 Ne<br />

<br />

f( , t) Ipcos<br />

( t)<br />

<br />

2 2 <br />

(3.62)<br />

As before, the MMF is known to exist in the airgap, thus Equation (3.62) must describe some<br />

function of the angle around the stator. This shows then that the currents can be arbitrary and the<br />

distribution is still cosinusoidal, although it is perhaps not immediately obvious unless the form<br />

of Equation (3.7) is used. Of course, we should certainly expect this to be the case since<br />

Equations (3.6) and (3.7) are equal to one another.<br />

Now that the differences are resolved, an additional interpretation is presented. It was just shown<br />

that the equations with θ were the same as those without, simply because in the latter case, 0 .<br />

Figure 3.9 shows the distribution in θ, but if we set 0 it is clear that the equations give the<br />

peak of the MMF wave, measured from 0 . The reason that 0 in the SV equations is that<br />

the SV is defined in the stationary reference frame affixed to the stator. That means angles are<br />

defined as being measured from 0 . The importance of this is that if we can set 0 , we can<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!