18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, if the per-phase MMF distributions are not cosinusoidally distributed, SV theory cannot<br />

be used as shown here to analyze the machine. (This is essentially the reason why many articles<br />

in the literature assume a sinusoidal machine, even if the article specifically concerns a<br />

trapezoidal machine.) The statement that SV theory applies only to sinusoidal machines is given<br />

without proof in [87, p.34], [43, p.223]. It does not mean that the theory cannot be augmented to<br />

describe nonsinusoidal machines [87, p.53]; it simply means that the theory as presented here<br />

cannot be used to describe them unless modifications are made. From Appendix C, when a<br />

nonsinusoidal machine is modeled using SV theory only the fundamental component of torque<br />

and bEMF will be represented. The reason this is important is that the expression for torque<br />

production involves the magnitude of the MMF (or flux, flux linkage, flux density, or field<br />

strength) of the stator. If the phase MMF distributions are not sinusoidal, they will not sum to a<br />

sinusoid of 3/2 amplitude, even for balanced sinusoidal current, thus the torque expression will be<br />

invalid.<br />

Before moving on, one important observation will be made regarding the MMF space vector’s<br />

representation of a distributed quantity. This section began with the real-valued expression of<br />

stator MMF, Equation (3.2), which was reproduced as Equation (3.51):<br />

<br />

<br />

i( t)<br />

cos( ) i ( t)<br />

cos( 120<br />

) i ( ) cos( 120<br />

) <br />

N e<br />

f ( , t)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C t <br />

2<br />

This was reworked to give an equivalent complex form, Equation (3.56):<br />

Ne<br />

j<br />

f , t Rei<br />

e <br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

,<br />

<br />

which has provided satisfactory results in this discussion. One of those results was the<br />

expression that describes the MMF resulting from balanced sinusoidal currents, Equation<br />

(3.58):<br />

3 N <br />

f t Ipt<br />

2 2 <br />

e<br />

, cos<br />

<br />

.<br />

But earlier (in the section “Additivity of MMF and Current Space Vectors”), balanced<br />

sinusoidal currents were substituted into the MMF SV definition, Equation (3.41):<br />

Ne<br />

<br />

jj f kiA()1 t i B() t e iC() t e<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

and the result was the SV representation of MMF due to balanced sinusoidal currents,<br />

Equation (3.49):<br />

.<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!