18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

theory and will be very useful. Since it is vital to understand reference frame theory, and since the<br />

distribution of the MMF SV coincides with the physical distribution, it is the author’s opinion<br />

that studying the MMF’s distribution is the only connection point between the familiar physical<br />

understanding of the machine and the abstract SV representation. With this opinion in mind it is<br />

first shown how the stator MMF SV represents the actual MMF distribution produced by the<br />

stator current. Then the previously-defined relationship between the stator current SV and the<br />

stator MMF SV is discussed to reveal the interpretation of the current SV.<br />

MMF Space Vector and its Distribution<br />

This subsection demonstrates how the MMF SV represents the actual MMF distribution in the<br />

machine. We will also gain a more solid understanding of reference frame theory.<br />

In the CRT example the concept of a Cartesian voltage vector was reasonable because the force is<br />

a linear one which acts in the plane perpendicular to the electron beam. But in a synchronous<br />

machine the stator MMF does not simply act along a vector in a plane—it is a distribution about<br />

the stator periphery. It is obvious from the development of the MMF wave earlier in the chapter<br />

that the MMF distribution is cosinusoidal in θ, but this is perhaps not obvious from the math<br />

presented thus far. To show that the MMF SV represents a cosinusoidal MMF distribution, return<br />

to the real-valued expression of stator MMF developed earlier in the chapter (Equation 3.2) which<br />

is reproduced here as Equation (3.51). Note that the currents are arbitrary and are not required<br />

to be sinusoidal.<br />

(3.2):<br />

f( , t) fA( ) fB( ) fC(<br />

)<br />

Ne <br />

iA( t) cos( ) iB( t) cos( 120 ) iC( t)<br />

cos( 120<br />

) <br />

2 <br />

(3.51)<br />

The cosine terms can be expanded into their complex equivalents using the identity in Equation<br />

(3.52).<br />

1 j<br />

j<br />

cos( )<br />

ee 2<br />

(3.52)<br />

Substituting the resulting expressions into Equation (3.51) and simplifying yields Equation<br />

(3.53).<br />

Ne<br />

1<br />

j j j j j j<br />

f , t <br />

iA ie B ie C eiA ie B ie<br />

C e<br />

2 2<br />

<br />

(3.53)<br />

Recognizing that the first parenthesis contains definition of the current space vector (k=1) and the<br />

second parenthesis contains its complex conjugate, this can be rewritten as Equation (3.54).<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!