18.07.2013 Views

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SENSORLESS FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF BRUSHLESS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

other methods, although it has close relationships to the other methods (phase-variable time-<br />

domain analysis and phasor analysis).<br />

A phasor can describe any sinusoidal scalar quantity. Although the phasor is used in three-phase<br />

analysis, the phasor is used to describe the quantities associated with only one of the phases (the<br />

reference phase, often phase-A) with the understanding that the system is balanced, hence<br />

information about the other two phases can be found by adding or subtracting a 120° phase shift.<br />

The analysis of one phase is often called “single-phase equivalent” analysis [39, p.547] and it is<br />

almost always coupled with phasor analysis (that is, the single-phase equivalent circuit is<br />

j<br />

analyzed using phasors). The phasor ( X <br />

Xe X)<br />

is a complex-valued entity and the<br />

real part represents the scalar quantity of interest; the complex entity does not necessarily have<br />

any physical interpretation as a vector, it is just a convenient mathematical form. In contrast, the<br />

()<br />

SV ( ˆ j t<br />

x Xt () e <br />

) is a complex-valued notation that describes a vector quantity that exists in<br />

the complex space; the entire complex entity has a physical interpretation as a vector (as opposed<br />

to only the real part). Of course the complex plane has no physical meaning but it is mapped to a<br />

real polar coordinate system that does have physical meaning. Yet, like a phasor, there is also<br />

meaning in only the real part of the SV. The complex notation exists to aid in mathematical<br />

manipulation (as with a phasor) but in addition the complex notation carries information about<br />

quantities physically distributed in the machine.<br />

Neither the SV nor the phasor can represent the zero-sequence component. Phasor analysis is<br />

only valid for circuits with balanced sinusoidal excitation in steady state whereas SV analysis is<br />

valid for arbitrary phase quantities and can describe transient behavior. When phasor analysis is<br />

coupled with the single-phase equivalent circuit the phasor “represents” all three phases working<br />

together, but only because the machine is balanced and the phase power can be multiplied by<br />

three to obtain total power. In contrast, the SV directly accounts for (contains information about)<br />

the total effect of each phase, even if the contributions of the phases are not equal.<br />

It will be seen that there are several aspects of SV theory. (Compare this with the phasor.<br />

Depending on the analysis, it may be treated as a stationary vector, a rotating vector, or a complex<br />

number, yet these are all simply different ways of looking at the definition.) The vector nature of<br />

the SV allows for intuitive graphical presentations similar to phasor diagrams. The SV is a<br />

complex number that can be easily manipulated mathematically. The SV represents rotating<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!