18.07.2013 Views

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

390 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Aramaic</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>: <strong>Targums</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>their</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Context</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> emphatic <strong>in</strong>clusion of the Gentiles ('all the <strong>in</strong>habitants of the<br />

earth') with<strong>in</strong> the eschatological worship of the Temple is therefore<br />

not only attested <strong>in</strong> the Targum, as <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>aiticus's version of Tobit, it<br />

is attested as a characteristic motif. And the same phrase is associated<br />

with the k<strong>in</strong>gdom of God <strong>in</strong> Targum Jonathan, notably—and <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>novative fashion—at Zech. 14.9. 35 <strong>The</strong> sanctuary, the k<strong>in</strong>gdom, and<br />

all the <strong>in</strong>habitants of the earth are therefore associated with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

Targum as the climax of God's revelation; S<strong>in</strong>aiticus's Tobit<br />

demonstrates that the first and third elements could be l<strong>in</strong>ked by the<br />

first century, while Mt. 8.11, 12 shows that the second and the third<br />

were also paired by that time. More generally, Jub. 4.26 establishes<br />

that the global range of the sanctuary was an expectation with<strong>in</strong> early<br />

Judaism. 36<br />

Targum Jonathan, together with Tobit and Jubilees, establishes that<br />

an expectation of global worship <strong>in</strong> the Temple was a feature of early<br />

Judaism, so that it is feasible that Paul aimed to promote a literal<br />

offer<strong>in</strong>g of the nations by means of his collection for the needs of the<br />

church <strong>in</strong> Jerusalem. <strong>The</strong> book of Acts is at pa<strong>in</strong>s to exculpate Paul<br />

from the charge that he <strong>in</strong>troduced Gentiles <strong>in</strong>to the prec<strong>in</strong>cts of the<br />

Temple (21.27-30). But that accusation, mounted by Jews from Asia<br />

who were <strong>in</strong> a position to know what Paul <strong>in</strong>tended (v. 27), is what <strong>in</strong><br />

Acts produces the attempt to kill Paul, and his subsequent (as it turned<br />

out, def<strong>in</strong>itive) arrest (vv. 31-40). Acts may not be consulted as a<br />

straightforward historical source, but the confused picture it conveys<br />

at this po<strong>in</strong>t may be consistent with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g from Paul's own letters<br />

that he <strong>in</strong>tended that Gentiles should be jo<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> the sacrificial<br />

worship of Israel. 37<br />

Paul's assertion <strong>in</strong> Rom. 3.25, that God appo<strong>in</strong>ted Jesus a<br />

iXaatTipiov 8ia Tuatecog ev TCO a\)io$ aiu,cm, 38 is not, therefore,<br />

35. Cf. 'Regnum Dei Deus Est', 101 (as published <strong>in</strong> Targumic Approaches).<br />

36. Cf. <strong>The</strong> Glory of Israel, '"Sanctuary" («ehpa)', pp. 18-24, and 130 n. 9.<br />

37. Particularly, the hypothesis expla<strong>in</strong>s why Paul, <strong>in</strong> Romans 9-11, <strong>in</strong>sists upon<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all believers with<strong>in</strong> the ambit of Israel at a moment of historic weakness <strong>in</strong><br />

the Jewish community <strong>in</strong> Rome, cf. B.D. Chilton, 'Romans 9-11 as Scriptural<br />

Interpretation and Dialogue with Judaism', ExAuditu 4 (1988), pp. 27-37.<br />

38. Cranfield (Romans, p. 210) rightly asserts that it is only natural to read the<br />

phrase concern<strong>in</strong>g blood with the noun iXacrr|piov. Campbell's attempt to separate<br />

them on the grounds that the proposition 5id is the structural key of the sentence,<br />

relies on a mechanical understand<strong>in</strong>g of Paul's rhetoric which is not shown to be<br />

Paul's own.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!