The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
18.07.2013 Views

THE AGGADAH OF THE PALESTINIAN TARGUMS OF THE PENTATEUCH AND RABBINIC AGGADAH: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS* Avigdor Shinan An overall glance at the post-biblical literature bequeathed to us by the Jewish people of antiquity reveals that it evolved mainly in the twin pillars of that society: the synagogue and the academy (Bet Midrash). 'Literature of the synagogue' is brought to our knowledge by means of prayer and liturgical poetry, as well as the Targum and different public sermons incorporated in rabbinic literature. 1 'Literature of the Bet Midrash' is eternalized primarily in the Mishnah and Tosefta, the Talmud of Palestine and that of Babylonia and in a wealth of midrashim from periods and kinds all and sundry. Differentiating between the two groups of literature, synagogue and Bet Midrash, and between the internal components of both, does not, of course, stand upon the razor's edge, since they were created by the same world of religious thought and orientation. Points of contact draw them closer, by a variety of bonds are they linked together, areas of interest overlap and interweave. Yet this differentiation has much to offer as a working hypothesis, and all in all seems to be fairly on target. My intention is to probe the questions of thematic affinities between two specific clusters from the branches listed above, namely the literature of the so-called 'Palestinian Targums' of the Pentateuch, whose affiliation with the synagogue is well known, 2 and the literature * I wish to express my thanks to Ann Brener for translating this paper from Hebrew. 1. For the term 'Literature of the Synagogue' I am indebted to J. Heinemann and JJ. Petuchowski, Literature of the Synagogue (New York, 1975). 2. See R. Syren, The Blessings in the Targums (Abo, 1986), pp. 157-60; cf. R. Kasher, The Aramaic Targumim and their Sitz im Leben', in Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress of Jewish Studies, Panel Sessions: Bible Studies (Jerusalem, 1988), pp. 75-85.

204 The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context of the rabbinic aggadah as expressed in Talmud and Midrash. A vast forest indeed, and it is therefore only natural that we find ourselves dealing primarily with generalizations. A bird's-eye view must of necessity renounce the individual trees. Yet even so, we shall not refrain from plumping out our already broad enough generalizations with a few pertinent examples. We have before us, therefore, two well-defined groups of texts: on the one hand the so-called 'Palestinian Targums' to the Pentateuch, encompassing the Neofiti MS with its thousands of marginal notes, the Fragment-Targum in its different versions, fragments of Targum from the Cairo Geniza, and snips of targumic quotations by the hundreds in secondary and tertiary sources, not excluding, to some extent, the Targum Pseudo-Jonathan. 3 On the other hand, we have the sprawling literature of Talmud and Midrash, contemporaries of Targum. Between these two groups are numerous parallels of content. 4 Side by side with these parallels we also find traditions of aggadah in the Targums that are exclusive to Targum, and to Targum alone, but assumed by many scholars to be taken from lost rabbinic texts. Our discussion will therefore be divided into two parts, and devoted to a consideration of these haves and have nots; that is, targumic traditions with parallels in Midrash and traditions without. 1. Parallels between Targum and Midrash Thousands of aggadic traditions in the Targums are found in Midrash as well. 5 Collators, scholars and composers of the various bibliographic tools are usually content to mention this fact, without attempting to divert the channel of inquiry into another direction, namely: which is the original source, and which is the one availing itself of that original? Yet when a scholar is intrepid enough to determine which of the two is the principal one and which is subordinate, the right of primogeniture invariably goes—and almost invariably 3. On Pseudo-Jonathan and its special place within the 'Palestinian Targums' see my recent book, The Embroidered Targum—The Aggadah in Targum Pseudo- Jonathan of the Pentateuch (Jerusalem, 1992) [Hebrew]. 4. See for instance the lists of parallels to Targum Neofiti compiled by E. Levine in A. Dfez Macho, Neophyti I (Madrid-Barcelona, 1968-1979). 5. This is no less true for the Halakhic material than it is for Aggadah, but that is not our subject.

THE AGGADAH OF THE PALESTINIAN TARGUMS OF THE PENTATEUCH<br />

AND RABBINIC AGGADAH:<br />

SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS*<br />

Avigdor Sh<strong>in</strong>an<br />

An overall glance at the post-biblical literature bequeathed to us by<br />

the Jewish people of antiquity reveals that it evolved ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the<br />

tw<strong>in</strong> pillars of that society: the synagogue and the academy (Bet<br />

Midrash). 'Literature of the synagogue' is brought to our knowledge<br />

by means of prayer and liturgical poetry, as well as the Targum and<br />

different public sermons <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> rabb<strong>in</strong>ic literature. 1<br />

'Literature of the Bet Midrash' is eternalized primarily <strong>in</strong> the Mishnah<br />

and Tosefta, the Talmud of Palest<strong>in</strong>e and that of Babylonia and <strong>in</strong> a<br />

wealth of midrashim from periods and k<strong>in</strong>ds all and sundry.<br />

Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g between the two groups of literature, synagogue and<br />

Bet Midrash, and between the <strong>in</strong>ternal components of both, does not,<br />

of course, stand upon the razor's edge, s<strong>in</strong>ce they were created by the<br />

same world of religious thought and orientation. Po<strong>in</strong>ts of contact<br />

draw them closer, by a variety of bonds are they l<strong>in</strong>ked together,<br />

areas of <strong>in</strong>terest overlap and <strong>in</strong>terweave. Yet this differentiation has<br />

much to offer as a work<strong>in</strong>g hypothesis, and all <strong>in</strong> all seems to be fairly<br />

on target. My <strong>in</strong>tention is to probe the questions of thematic aff<strong>in</strong>ities<br />

between two specific clusters from the branches listed above, namely<br />

the literature of the so-called 'Palest<strong>in</strong>ian <strong>Targums</strong>' of the Pentateuch,<br />

whose affiliation with the synagogue is well known, 2 and the literature<br />

* I wish to express my thanks to Ann Brener for translat<strong>in</strong>g this paper from<br />

Hebrew.<br />

1. For the term 'Literature of the Synagogue' I am <strong>in</strong>debted to J. He<strong>in</strong>emann<br />

and JJ. Petuchowski, Literature of the Synagogue (New York, 1975).<br />

2. See R. Syren, <strong>The</strong> Bless<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Targums</strong> (Abo, 1986), pp. 157-60;<br />

cf. R. Kasher, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Aramaic</strong> Targumim and <strong>their</strong> Sitz im Leben', <strong>in</strong> Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

the N<strong>in</strong>th World Congress of Jewish Studies, Panel Sessions: <strong>Bible</strong> Studies<br />

(Jerusalem, 1988), pp. 75-85.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!