The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
18.07.2013 Views

BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT 199 example for the Qumran study of the law was the maskil, that is the wise teacher (Dan. 12.3, Isa. 52.13) and the masdiq ha-rabbim, the man who leads many to righteousness (Dan 12.3; Isa. 53.11; see 1QS 3.13). The 'Teacher of Righteousness' was such a maskil and masdiq ha-rabbim, whilst the 'wise man' (hakham) became the title for the rabbinic teacher (see 4QMMT C 30). The Sadducees, as described by Josephus, did not develop new methods of searching and interpreting the law and of extending priestly purity to the lay-people. They were responsible for the cult in the temple and for the peace and political welfare in Israel. They had to lead the Jewish nation and to extend its territory even by fighting wars. Later on, the were obliged to cooperate with a king such as Herod the Great and with the Roman prefects. Therefore, they could not separate themselves from the world; they even adopted some Hellenistic ideas. From a methodological point of view, the search for discrepancies and incompatibilities within the texts from Qumran can be justified, but we should not over-estimate them. In our present situation, where the unpublished fragments from Cave 4 become gradually known and can be studied, we should be cautious and refrain from making farreaching conclusions and revolutionary theories and from speculating about non-Essenic texts in the Qumran Caves. We do better to study the many fragments of Cave 4 and try to understand them, especially in the light of the other Dead Sea Scrolls and of the reports of Josephus on the Essenes. There were many different opinions among the three religious groups in Early Judaism and even within them, especially on Levitical purity. 29 But they must not always be understood as signs for real conflicts and divisions; they rather indicate the difficulty of applying the law of Moses to a changed society and to new situations, of maintaining the ideal of ritual purity in an unclean and hostile world. The Bible, being the foundation of the religious groups in Judaism, provided both unity and diversity; Moses, but as implications of the written law, which are revealed by the holy spirit to those who study the law intensively. 29. One fundamental problem to those zealous students of the law such as the Pharisees and the Essenes was: do the Pentateuchal laws of purity and Levitical cleanness refer to the temple service and to the priests only or must they be extended to laymen and to eating of non-consecrated food, also? See G. Alon, 'The Bounds of the Laws of Levitical Cleanness', in Jews, Judaism, and the Classical World (Jerusalem, 1977), pp. 190-234.

200 The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context therefore we hear many different voices and have different interpretations even within the religious parties. (1) Among the rabbis, who taught in the Pharisaic tradition, we have different schools such as Beth Hillel and Beth Shammai, R. Aqiba versus R. Ishmael; a man called Sadoq, who became the co-founder of the Zealots, was a former Pharisee (Ant. 18.3). (2) The Zealots were divided into various groups, who at the end even fought against one another (War 5.Iff.). (3) The priestly party consisted of several groups and individuals: the 'Bene Sadoq' = Essenes, the Boethusians and the Tobele Shaharin = 'those, who took a ritual bath in the morning' (t. Yad. 1.20), then outstanding figures such as John the Baptist (Mk 1.1-12) or Bannus (Josephus, Life § 11). All these were separated from or stood in opposition to the party of the Sadducees, mentioned in the writings of Josephus and in the New Testament. For the time of John the Baptist, the Pseudo-Clementines (Recognitiones 1.53-54) report about a schism in the Sadducean party: 'Erat enim primum schisma eorum, qui dicebantur Sadducaei. Hique ut caeteris iustiores segregare se coepere a populi coetu'. This note on the segregation of the 'more righteous ones' (iustiores = saddiqim mm) among the Sadducees reminds us strongly of 4QMMT: we have separated from the mass of the people (merob ha'am cf. 'a populi coetu'); the late note may refer to the orthodox Sadducees of the Mishnah (Yad. 4.6-9, see t. Yad. 1.20). Finally, there were conflicts schisms and different groups among the Essenes-Qumranites, too. In 4QpNah 4.1 the 'House of Peleg' is mentioned; it joined 'Manassee' which means the party of the Sadducees. According to CD 19.33-34 some of those, who had entered the New Covenant in the Land of Damascus, turned and broke away from it; they left 'the Fountain of Life'. We hear in IQpHab 5.9-11 about the 'House of Absalom' and the men of his council. They remained silent when the Teacher of Righteousness was reproached; they did not help him against the 'Man of Lie' who rejected the law in their whole community. The 'Man of Lie' and the 'House of Absalom' may have been former adherents of the Teacher of Righteousness who had turned to the Pharisees. A legitimate difference seems to be mentioned by Josephus: he speaks of 'another Essene order' (heteron Essenon tagma, War 2.160-161), whose members were married, but generally followed the teachings and principles of the monastic community.

200 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Aramaic</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>: <strong>Targums</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>their</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Context</strong><br />

therefore we hear many different voices and have different <strong>in</strong>terpretations<br />

even with<strong>in</strong> the religious parties. (1) Among the rabbis,<br />

who taught <strong>in</strong> the Pharisaic tradition, we have different schools such<br />

as Beth Hillel and Beth Shammai, R. Aqiba versus R. Ishmael; a man<br />

called Sadoq, who became the co-founder of the Zealots, was a former<br />

Pharisee (Ant. 18.3). (2) <strong>The</strong> Zealots were divided <strong>in</strong>to various<br />

groups, who at the end even fought aga<strong>in</strong>st one another (War 5.Iff.).<br />

(3) <strong>The</strong> priestly party consisted of several groups and <strong>in</strong>dividuals: the<br />

'Bene Sadoq' = Essenes, the Boethusians and the Tobele Shahar<strong>in</strong> =<br />

'those, who took a ritual bath <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g' (t. Yad. 1.20), then<br />

outstand<strong>in</strong>g figures such as John the Baptist (Mk 1.1-12) or Bannus<br />

(Josephus, Life § 11). All these were separated from or stood <strong>in</strong><br />

opposition to the party of the Sadducees, mentioned <strong>in</strong> the writ<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

Josephus and <strong>in</strong> the New Testament. For the time of John the Baptist,<br />

the Pseudo-Clement<strong>in</strong>es (Recognitiones 1.53-54) report about a schism<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Sadducean party: 'Erat enim primum schisma eorum, qui<br />

dicebantur Sadducaei. Hique ut caeteris iustiores segregare se coepere<br />

a populi coetu'. This note on the segregation of the 'more righteous<br />

ones' (iustiores = saddiqim mm) among the Sadducees rem<strong>in</strong>ds us<br />

strongly of 4QMMT: we have separated from the mass of the people<br />

(merob ha'am cf. 'a populi coetu'); the late note may refer to the<br />

orthodox Sadducees of the Mishnah (Yad. 4.6-9, see t. Yad. 1.20).<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, there were conflicts schisms and different groups among the<br />

Essenes-Qumranites, too. In 4QpNah 4.1 the 'House of Peleg' is<br />

mentioned; it jo<strong>in</strong>ed 'Manassee' which means the party of the<br />

Sadducees. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to CD 19.33-34 some of those, who had entered<br />

the New Covenant <strong>in</strong> the Land of Damascus, turned and broke away<br />

from it; they left 'the Founta<strong>in</strong> of Life'. We hear <strong>in</strong> IQpHab 5.9-11<br />

about the 'House of Absalom' and the men of his council. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed silent when the Teacher of Righteousness was reproached;<br />

they did not help him aga<strong>in</strong>st the 'Man of Lie' who rejected the law <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>their</strong> whole community. <strong>The</strong> 'Man of Lie' and the 'House of Absalom'<br />

may have been former adherents of the Teacher of Righteousness who<br />

had turned to the Pharisees. A legitimate difference seems to be<br />

mentioned by Josephus: he speaks of 'another Essene order' (heteron<br />

Essenon tagma, War 2.160-161), whose members were married, but<br />

generally followed the teach<strong>in</strong>gs and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the monastic<br />

community.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!