The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context
The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context
BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT 199 example for the Qumran study of the law was the maskil, that is the wise teacher (Dan. 12.3, Isa. 52.13) and the masdiq ha-rabbim, the man who leads many to righteousness (Dan 12.3; Isa. 53.11; see 1QS 3.13). The 'Teacher of Righteousness' was such a maskil and masdiq ha-rabbim, whilst the 'wise man' (hakham) became the title for the rabbinic teacher (see 4QMMT C 30). The Sadducees, as described by Josephus, did not develop new methods of searching and interpreting the law and of extending priestly purity to the lay-people. They were responsible for the cult in the temple and for the peace and political welfare in Israel. They had to lead the Jewish nation and to extend its territory even by fighting wars. Later on, the were obliged to cooperate with a king such as Herod the Great and with the Roman prefects. Therefore, they could not separate themselves from the world; they even adopted some Hellenistic ideas. From a methodological point of view, the search for discrepancies and incompatibilities within the texts from Qumran can be justified, but we should not over-estimate them. In our present situation, where the unpublished fragments from Cave 4 become gradually known and can be studied, we should be cautious and refrain from making farreaching conclusions and revolutionary theories and from speculating about non-Essenic texts in the Qumran Caves. We do better to study the many fragments of Cave 4 and try to understand them, especially in the light of the other Dead Sea Scrolls and of the reports of Josephus on the Essenes. There were many different opinions among the three religious groups in Early Judaism and even within them, especially on Levitical purity. 29 But they must not always be understood as signs for real conflicts and divisions; they rather indicate the difficulty of applying the law of Moses to a changed society and to new situations, of maintaining the ideal of ritual purity in an unclean and hostile world. The Bible, being the foundation of the religious groups in Judaism, provided both unity and diversity; Moses, but as implications of the written law, which are revealed by the holy spirit to those who study the law intensively. 29. One fundamental problem to those zealous students of the law such as the Pharisees and the Essenes was: do the Pentateuchal laws of purity and Levitical cleanness refer to the temple service and to the priests only or must they be extended to laymen and to eating of non-consecrated food, also? See G. Alon, 'The Bounds of the Laws of Levitical Cleanness', in Jews, Judaism, and the Classical World (Jerusalem, 1977), pp. 190-234.
200 The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context therefore we hear many different voices and have different interpretations even within the religious parties. (1) Among the rabbis, who taught in the Pharisaic tradition, we have different schools such as Beth Hillel and Beth Shammai, R. Aqiba versus R. Ishmael; a man called Sadoq, who became the co-founder of the Zealots, was a former Pharisee (Ant. 18.3). (2) The Zealots were divided into various groups, who at the end even fought against one another (War 5.Iff.). (3) The priestly party consisted of several groups and individuals: the 'Bene Sadoq' = Essenes, the Boethusians and the Tobele Shaharin = 'those, who took a ritual bath in the morning' (t. Yad. 1.20), then outstanding figures such as John the Baptist (Mk 1.1-12) or Bannus (Josephus, Life § 11). All these were separated from or stood in opposition to the party of the Sadducees, mentioned in the writings of Josephus and in the New Testament. For the time of John the Baptist, the Pseudo-Clementines (Recognitiones 1.53-54) report about a schism in the Sadducean party: 'Erat enim primum schisma eorum, qui dicebantur Sadducaei. Hique ut caeteris iustiores segregare se coepere a populi coetu'. This note on the segregation of the 'more righteous ones' (iustiores = saddiqim mm) among the Sadducees reminds us strongly of 4QMMT: we have separated from the mass of the people (merob ha'am cf. 'a populi coetu'); the late note may refer to the orthodox Sadducees of the Mishnah (Yad. 4.6-9, see t. Yad. 1.20). Finally, there were conflicts schisms and different groups among the Essenes-Qumranites, too. In 4QpNah 4.1 the 'House of Peleg' is mentioned; it joined 'Manassee' which means the party of the Sadducees. According to CD 19.33-34 some of those, who had entered the New Covenant in the Land of Damascus, turned and broke away from it; they left 'the Fountain of Life'. We hear in IQpHab 5.9-11 about the 'House of Absalom' and the men of his council. They remained silent when the Teacher of Righteousness was reproached; they did not help him against the 'Man of Lie' who rejected the law in their whole community. The 'Man of Lie' and the 'House of Absalom' may have been former adherents of the Teacher of Righteousness who had turned to the Pharisees. A legitimate difference seems to be mentioned by Josephus: he speaks of 'another Essene order' (heteron Essenon tagma, War 2.160-161), whose members were married, but generally followed the teachings and principles of the monastic community.
- Page 150 and 151: COOK The Language of Onqelos and Jo
- Page 152 and 153: COOK The Language of Onqelos and Jo
- Page 154 and 155: COOK The Language of Onqelos and Jo
- Page 156 and 157: COOK The Language of Onqelos and Jo
- Page 158 and 159: Part III THE TARGUMS AND JEWISH BIB
- Page 160 and 161: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 162 and 163: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 164 and 165: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 166 and 167: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 168 and 169: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 170 and 171: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 172 and 173: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 174 and 175: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 176 and 177: HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Tem
- Page 178 and 179: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 180 and 181: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 182 and 183: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 184 and 185: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 186 and 187: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 188 and 189: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 190 and 191: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 192 and 193: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 194 and 195: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 196 and 197: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 198 and 199: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 202 and 203: BETZ The Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT
- Page 204 and 205: THE AGGADAH OF THE PALESTINIAN TARG
- Page 206 and 207: SHINAN The Aggadah of the Palestini
- Page 208 and 209: SHINAN The Aggadah of the Palestini
- Page 210 and 211: SHINAN The Aggadah of the Palestini
- Page 212 and 213: SHINAN The Aggadah of the Palestini
- Page 214 and 215: SHINAN The Aggadah of the Palestini
- Page 216 and 217: SHINAN The Aggadah of the Palestini
- Page 218 and 219: SHINAN The Aggadah of the Palestini
- Page 220 and 221: RIB ERA The Targum: From Translatio
- Page 222 and 223: RIB ERA The Tar gum: From Translati
- Page 224 and 225: RibERA The Targum: From Translation
- Page 226 and 227: RlBERA The Targum: From Translation
- Page 228 and 229: Part IV TARGUMS OF THE PENTATEUCH
- Page 230 and 231: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 232 and 233: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 234 and 235: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 236 and 237: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 238 and 239: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 240 and 241: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 242 and 243: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 244 and 245: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 246 and 247: GROSSFELD Onqelos, Halakha and the
- Page 248 and 249: MAPPING THE SYNOPTIC PALESTINIAN TA
200 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Aramaic</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>: <strong>Targums</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>their</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Context</strong><br />
therefore we hear many different voices and have different <strong>in</strong>terpretations<br />
even with<strong>in</strong> the religious parties. (1) Among the rabbis,<br />
who taught <strong>in</strong> the Pharisaic tradition, we have different schools such<br />
as Beth Hillel and Beth Shammai, R. Aqiba versus R. Ishmael; a man<br />
called Sadoq, who became the co-founder of the Zealots, was a former<br />
Pharisee (Ant. 18.3). (2) <strong>The</strong> Zealots were divided <strong>in</strong>to various<br />
groups, who at the end even fought aga<strong>in</strong>st one another (War 5.Iff.).<br />
(3) <strong>The</strong> priestly party consisted of several groups and <strong>in</strong>dividuals: the<br />
'Bene Sadoq' = Essenes, the Boethusians and the Tobele Shahar<strong>in</strong> =<br />
'those, who took a ritual bath <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g' (t. Yad. 1.20), then<br />
outstand<strong>in</strong>g figures such as John the Baptist (Mk 1.1-12) or Bannus<br />
(Josephus, Life § 11). All these were separated from or stood <strong>in</strong><br />
opposition to the party of the Sadducees, mentioned <strong>in</strong> the writ<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />
Josephus and <strong>in</strong> the New Testament. For the time of John the Baptist,<br />
the Pseudo-Clement<strong>in</strong>es (Recognitiones 1.53-54) report about a schism<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Sadducean party: 'Erat enim primum schisma eorum, qui<br />
dicebantur Sadducaei. Hique ut caeteris iustiores segregare se coepere<br />
a populi coetu'. This note on the segregation of the 'more righteous<br />
ones' (iustiores = saddiqim mm) among the Sadducees rem<strong>in</strong>ds us<br />
strongly of 4QMMT: we have separated from the mass of the people<br />
(merob ha'am cf. 'a populi coetu'); the late note may refer to the<br />
orthodox Sadducees of the Mishnah (Yad. 4.6-9, see t. Yad. 1.20).<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, there were conflicts schisms and different groups among the<br />
Essenes-Qumranites, too. In 4QpNah 4.1 the 'House of Peleg' is<br />
mentioned; it jo<strong>in</strong>ed 'Manassee' which means the party of the<br />
Sadducees. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to CD 19.33-34 some of those, who had entered<br />
the New Covenant <strong>in</strong> the Land of Damascus, turned and broke away<br />
from it; they left 'the Founta<strong>in</strong> of Life'. We hear <strong>in</strong> IQpHab 5.9-11<br />
about the 'House of Absalom' and the men of his council. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed silent when the Teacher of Righteousness was reproached;<br />
they did not help him aga<strong>in</strong>st the 'Man of Lie' who rejected the law <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>their</strong> whole community. <strong>The</strong> 'Man of Lie' and the 'House of Absalom'<br />
may have been former adherents of the Teacher of Righteousness who<br />
had turned to the Pharisees. A legitimate difference seems to be<br />
mentioned by Josephus: he speaks of 'another Essene order' (heteron<br />
Essenon tagma, War 2.160-161), whose members were married, but<br />
generally followed the teach<strong>in</strong>gs and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the monastic<br />
community.