18.07.2013 Views

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Aramaic</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>: Tar gums <strong>in</strong> <strong>their</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Context</strong><br />

may have approved Jehonathan's action aga<strong>in</strong>st the 800 rebell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Pharisees, who were crucified for the crime of high treason. 27 His<br />

assumption is confirmed by the hitherto unpublished fragment CD D e<br />

II. That is why the Qumran Essenes could have prayed for the shalom<br />

of this k<strong>in</strong>g, especially <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of his rule. Later on, however,<br />

Jehonathan-Jannaeus became a 'Wicked Priest'. Such a change of<br />

attitude of the Essenes toward a k<strong>in</strong>g of Israel is told by Josephus<br />

(Ant. 15.373-379). When the Essene prophet Manaemus-Menachem<br />

saw the young Herod as a schoolboy, he greeted him as the future k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the Jews (§ 373). But he also predicted that Herod dur<strong>in</strong>g his rule<br />

would forget the card<strong>in</strong>al virtues of a k<strong>in</strong>g, such as love for justice,<br />

piety toward God, and mildness to the citizens (§ 375-376). However,<br />

if 4QMMT was actually written <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of Essene history, its<br />

recipient cannot be Jehonathan-Jannaeus; we must rather th<strong>in</strong>k of<br />

Jonathan, the brother of Judas the Maccabee and first high priest after<br />

the Interim 159-152 BC.<br />

In a recent article <strong>The</strong> Two Wicked Priests <strong>in</strong> the Qumran<br />

Commentary on Habakkuk', I. Tantlewski (St Petersburg) holds that<br />

the data on the 'Wicked Priest' <strong>in</strong> IQpHab must refer to two<br />

Hasmonean rulers: to Jonathan, the first high priest (152-143 BCE)<br />

and to Jehonathan-Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BCE).<br />

Jonathan is described <strong>in</strong> IQpHab 1.13-11.8 as a man of the past: 'He<br />

was called <strong>in</strong> the name of Truth at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of his office. But<br />

when he became ruler <strong>in</strong> Israel, his heart got haughty, he forsook God<br />

and betrayed the commandments because of wealth' (8.8-13). He persecuted<br />

the Teacher of Righteousness, appeared on the Day of<br />

Atonement at the place of his exile (Damascus) <strong>in</strong> order to swallow<br />

him and his community (11.4-8; see 5.9-10; 9.11-12). Because of this<br />

s<strong>in</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st the Teacher he was given <strong>in</strong>to the hands of his enemies who<br />

mistreated him by blows of annihilation (9.1-2, 9-12). This description<br />

of the fate of the 'Wicked Priest', predicted by the prophet<br />

Habakkuk, is <strong>in</strong> agreement with the end of Jonathan the Maccabbee as<br />

reported <strong>in</strong> 1 Mace. 12.46 and by Josephus (Ant. 13.191-193.209):<br />

Jonathan was caught, punished, and killed by the Syrian Tryphon.<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> IQpHab 11.8-15, 11.17-12.10 a different 'Wicked Priest'<br />

must be spoken of. He is <strong>in</strong>troduced by the words: 'You, too'<br />

(Hab. 2.16; IQpHab 11.9). His s<strong>in</strong>s are described <strong>in</strong> the past tense: his<br />

27. Megillath Ha-Miqdash I, p. 289; II, pp. 203-205. Wacholder and Abegg,<br />

'Unpublished Dead Sea Scrolls', p. 41.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!