18.07.2013 Views

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BETZ <strong>The</strong> Qumran Halakhah Text 4QMMT 187<br />

(?), 26-27). In the Mishnah, too, we f<strong>in</strong>d criticism of the priests, even<br />

of the high priest, because of <strong>their</strong> handl<strong>in</strong>g the tebul yom. We have to<br />

turn to the Tractate Parah (3.7-8). <strong>The</strong>re, however, the Sadducees,<br />

represented by the high priest, are blamed for <strong>their</strong> rigorism. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

considered the tebul yom unclean till even<strong>in</strong>g, exactly as <strong>in</strong> 4QMMT B<br />

15. <strong>The</strong> Hakhamim, however, declared him fit for perform<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

ceremony right after his immersion. 18<br />

<strong>The</strong> passage Num. 19.7-10 was <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> a different way: the<br />

Pharisees of the Mishnah related the term, 'ish tahor (Num. 19.9) to<br />

the tebul yom <strong>in</strong> Num. 19.7 and concluded: he is clean after<br />

immersion (m. Par. 3.7). 4QMMT and the Sadducees of the Mishnah<br />

were more correct than the Hakhamim of the Pharisees. For the<br />

sterotyped decision at the end of Num. 19.7 and 19.8 is quite clear:<br />

'unclean (tame'} is (the priest) till even<strong>in</strong>g'; see Targum Onqelos;<br />

Wihe mesa'abkahana' 'adramsha' (Lev. 11.24, 25, 32). <strong>The</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is purposely changed <strong>in</strong> Pseudo-Jonathan, where the phrase qodom<br />

tibuleh ('before his immersion') is <strong>in</strong>serted (Num. 19.7, 8, 10); this<br />

means that the ritual bath renders the tebul yom pure right away. 19<br />

4QMMT is quite consistent with regard to purity and with the<br />

application of the formula 'unclean till the even<strong>in</strong>g' (Lev 11.24, 25,<br />

32). <strong>The</strong> case of the leper who was healed is dealt with <strong>in</strong> an analogous<br />

way (B 64-72, see Lev. 14.7-9). <strong>The</strong> ceremony of his ritual<br />

purification lasts seven days; but he cannot eat from the holy food<br />

'until the sun sets on the eighth day' (B 72). Lev. 14.9 does not say<br />

this explicitly; however, the rite of purification is cont<strong>in</strong>ued by<br />

sacrifices on the eighth day (Lev. 14.10-20).<br />

E. 4QMMT, the Temple Scroll (llQMiqdash), and the Longer<br />

Version of the Zadokite Fragments (CD) accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

some Fragments from Cave IV<br />

We saw that 4QMMT and the Temple Scroll are <strong>in</strong> basic agreement on<br />

the issue of the tebul yom. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to L.H. Schiffman, the same<br />

holds true for other controversial themes (= ma'ase ha-torah),<br />

brought forth <strong>in</strong> 4QMMT: (a) the Shelamim sacrifices must be eaten<br />

on the day when they are offered (B 9-12); (b) the sk<strong>in</strong>s of cattle<br />

18. See Albeck, Shishshah Sidre, pp. 457-58.<br />

19. <strong>The</strong> Mishnah tells us how the 'Elders of Israel' enacted <strong>their</strong> more lenient<br />

halakhah forcefully over aga<strong>in</strong>st the priests and even the high priest (m. Par. 3.7).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!