The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
18.07.2013 Views

HENGEL The Scriptures in Second Temple Judaism 165 is, the teacher of wisdom, exhibits the traits of a prophetic revealer of a new order: I will again make instruction shine forth like the dawn... I will again pour out teaching in prophecy (Sir. 24.33). We find this 'prophetically inspired' consciousness of the scribe again in the description of the sofer in Sir. 38.24-39.12, who can totally devote himself to the study of wisdom. This happens in his scripture research: 'He devotes himself to the study of the law of the Most High. . . he will be concerned with prophecies.' In the early morning he begins his studies with a prayer and is filled, like a prophet, 'with the spirit of understanding'. Then he meditates on the secrets of God and finally he glories in 'the law of the Lord's covenant'. Much more frequently than the older wisdom, Ben Sira refers directly to the Torah, that is, the concrete word of scripture. This leads to a conclusion which contradicts the older wisdom: It is better to be poor in understanding and God-fearing than rich in understanding and a transgressor of the law. Therefore the following motto holds: if you seek wisdom keep the commandments. 6 The prophetic books are therefore for him no less important that the Torah. Both together form a unity, and together they constitute the quintessence of God's wisdom. This is expressed in the praise of the Fathers, an encomium on the great figures in the biblical history of Israel. 7 Here not only the rulers of the people but, even more, the biblical authors are praised: the seers of all things in their prophetic office, the reflective wise ones in their scribal learning, the makers of proverbs in their loyality to tradition (44.3-5). Here already the grandson's tripartite canon, which also contains the books of Wisdom, becomes visible. The fact that here the Prophets are the centre of interest can be explained through his description of Joshua as 'the helper of Moses in the prophetic office' (46.1), and because he begins the series of prophets with him. In the end the twelve Minor Prophets proclaim Jacob's 'salvation' and 'hope' a 6. Sir. 19.20, 24; cf 33.2. 7. Sir. 44-50.

166 The Aramaic Bible: Tar gums in their Historical Context promise which is fulfilled in the construction of the Second Temple because the rebuilt sanctuary has been 'prepared for eternal glory'. 8 His high regard for the cult and the priestly office suggest that he was a priest scribe. Therefore he can say that God entrusted not only Moses with the 'Torah of Life' but also Aaron: In his commandments he gave him authority in statutes and judgements, to teach Jacob the testimonies, and to enlighten Israel with his law. 9 Ben Sira still understands the exegesis of the Torah as a priestly privilege. The offices of priest and prophet do not exist in opposition to one another because for him prophets had only a temporary function between Joshua and the construction of the Second Temple. In the present time the priestly exegete of the holy scriptures, enlightened by God's Spirit, has replaced the prophets. Ben Sira thus forms a spiritual-intellectual pivotal point. He is a wise man of synthesis who unites contrary aspects: Wisdom and Torah, universal knowledge and observance of the scriptures, sapiential reason and faith based on revelation, priestly concern with order and prophetic inspiration, Temple cult and ethical action. But he finds himself faced with a threatening crisis. This daring synthesis cannot hold in this form. His emphatic warning to all the priests to remain united 10 and his critical analysis of the Zeitgeist shows that his attempted synthesis is connected with a threat. This crisis becomes evident in the experiment of the 'Hellenistic reform' in Jerusalem which was initiated by the leading priests. This reform leads the community in Jerusalem to the brink of self-destruction. In effect he has arrived at a crossroads: how can it continue to be true that exegesis of scriptures remain a privilege of the priests, if he himself does not any more regard wisdom as a privilege of an aristocratic group, but instead invites all who want to learn into his school? 11 And if he himself describes his activity as exegete and poet in prophetic terms and claims to do his work by the divine charism of the Spirit, will this not lead to a new form of 'inspired exegesis', such as one meets in the apocalyptic texts? And if the priestly aristocracy 8. Sir. 49.10, 12. 9. Sir. 45.5, 17; cf. 45.26; Mai. 2.7; Deut. 33.10. 10. Sir. 41.8-9; cf. 2.3; 4.19 etc; M. Hengel, Judaism and Hellenism (London: SCM Press, 1974), p. 271. 11. Sir. 51.23; cf. 51.29.

166 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Aramaic</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>: Tar gums <strong>in</strong> <strong>their</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Context</strong><br />

promise which is fulfilled <strong>in</strong> the construction of the Second Temple<br />

because the rebuilt sanctuary has been 'prepared for eternal glory'. 8<br />

His high regard for the cult and the priestly office suggest that he<br />

was a priest scribe. <strong>The</strong>refore he can say that God entrusted not only<br />

Moses with the 'Torah of Life' but also Aaron:<br />

In his commandments he gave him authority <strong>in</strong> statutes and judgements,<br />

to teach Jacob the testimonies, and to enlighten Israel with his law. 9<br />

Ben Sira still understands the exegesis of the Torah as a priestly<br />

privilege. <strong>The</strong> offices of priest and prophet do not exist <strong>in</strong> opposition<br />

to one another because for him prophets had only a temporary function<br />

between Joshua and the construction of the Second Temple. In the<br />

present time the priestly exegete of the holy scriptures, enlightened by<br />

God's Spirit, has replaced the prophets.<br />

Ben Sira thus forms a spiritual-<strong>in</strong>tellectual pivotal po<strong>in</strong>t. He is a<br />

wise man of synthesis who unites contrary aspects: Wisdom and<br />

Torah, universal knowledge and observance of the scriptures, sapiential<br />

reason and faith based on revelation, priestly concern with order<br />

and prophetic <strong>in</strong>spiration, Temple cult and ethical action. But he f<strong>in</strong>ds<br />

himself faced with a threaten<strong>in</strong>g crisis. This dar<strong>in</strong>g synthesis cannot<br />

hold <strong>in</strong> this form. His emphatic warn<strong>in</strong>g to all the priests to rema<strong>in</strong><br />

united 10 and his critical analysis of the Zeitgeist shows that his<br />

attempted synthesis is connected with a threat. This crisis becomes<br />

evident <strong>in</strong> the experiment of the 'Hellenistic reform' <strong>in</strong> Jerusalem<br />

which was <strong>in</strong>itiated by the lead<strong>in</strong>g priests. This reform leads the<br />

community <strong>in</strong> Jerusalem to the br<strong>in</strong>k of self-destruction.<br />

In effect he has arrived at a crossroads: how can it cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be<br />

true that exegesis of scriptures rema<strong>in</strong> a privilege of the priests, if he<br />

himself does not any more regard wisdom as a privilege of an aristocratic<br />

group, but <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>in</strong>vites all who want to learn <strong>in</strong>to his<br />

school? 11 And if he himself describes his activity as exegete and poet<br />

<strong>in</strong> prophetic terms and claims to do his work by the div<strong>in</strong>e charism of<br />

the Spirit, will this not lead to a new form of '<strong>in</strong>spired exegesis', such<br />

as one meets <strong>in</strong> the apocalyptic texts? And if the priestly aristocracy<br />

8. Sir. 49.10, 12.<br />

9. Sir. 45.5, 17; cf. 45.26; Mai. 2.7; Deut. 33.10.<br />

10. Sir. 41.8-9; cf. 2.3; 4.19 etc; M. Hengel, Judaism and Hellenism (London:<br />

SCM Press, 1974), p. 271.<br />

11. Sir. 51.23; cf. 51.29.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!