18.07.2013 Views

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXCURSUS V 293<br />

What, <strong>the</strong>n, is to be said in favour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Acts</strong><br />

(and <strong>the</strong>refore also <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel) having been already<br />

written at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seventh decade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

first century. <strong>The</strong>re are, in my opinion, <strong>the</strong> following<br />

very weighty considerations :<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> great difficulty presented by <strong>the</strong> conclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Acts</strong> is undoubtedly removed in <strong>the</strong> simplest<br />

way if St. Luke wrote his work soon after <strong>the</strong> two<br />

years which St. Paul spent in Rome, and thus while<br />

<strong>the</strong> Apostle was still alive.-^ We can also explain<br />

away this difficulty on o<strong>the</strong>r hypo<strong>the</strong>ses (vide supra,<br />

pp. 2tSff.)—for it must be explained!—but none <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m are quite satisfactory or very illuminating.<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> discrepancy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passage. <strong>Acts</strong> xx. 25<br />

" Ye will see my face no more " (cf. xx. 38), with<br />

<strong>the</strong> genuine information given in 2 Timothy is thus<br />

by <strong>the</strong>ir disciples or acquaintances. Does any one deny that Xenophon<br />

was personally acquainted with Socrates because his Memora-<br />

bilia is such a defective work and betrays so little <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> great thinker? Or does any one deny such acquaintance to<br />

Plato because he has so drawn <strong>the</strong> portrait <strong>of</strong> Socrates with such<br />

freedom in his dialogues ? Or must we refuse to ascribe <strong>the</strong> Life<br />

<strong>of</strong> Constantine to Eusebius because it contains much that is <strong>of</strong><br />

questionable authority concerning <strong>the</strong> emperor? Need I even<br />

mention <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Sulpicius Severus and Martin <strong>of</strong> Tours, or <strong>of</strong><br />

Athanasius and Anthony ?<br />

—<br />

^ I do see see that in any passage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book St. Peter and St.<br />

Paul are so treated that we may presume that <strong>the</strong>y were already<br />

dead ; ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> contrary. In xi. 24 we read <strong>of</strong> St. Barnabas : 8ti<br />

fjv dvrjp dyadbs Kal irXripTis irvevfxaTos dylov. It seems, <strong>the</strong>refore, to be<br />

presupposed that he was already dead. But even this inference is<br />

unsafe; compare xxi. 9: ^L\iwir(p ^aav Ovyar^pes Ticaape^.—It has<br />

been remarked above on p. 41 that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Acts</strong> could not have been<br />

written at <strong>the</strong> close <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ster/a spoken <strong>of</strong> in <strong>the</strong> last verse ; but<br />

<strong>the</strong> book could very well have been composed after <strong>the</strong>se two years<br />

had elapsed, and before <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostle in Rome.<br />

:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!