The Acts of the Apostles
The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles
286 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES alone,^ but for the Jews this doctrine was only neces- sary in so far as they fell short of the fulfilment of the Law, and therefore, beside and apart from the Law, still required the forgiveness of sins in order to be quite righteous (xiii. 38, 39). On the whole St. Luke, though himself a Gentile, stands nearer than St. Paul to the Law—we may therefore also call his attitude more primitive ; for it is certainly not to be regarded as reactionary, but as the reflexion of the historical conditions of a time when the Jewish Christians still played a very important part, and when the Gentile Christians had not yet lost their reverence for the religio a7itiqua, and had not yet arrived at a distinct self-consciousness of their own in the face of Judaism. Though St. Luke may even give an allegorical interpretation of a passage in the Law, he still regards Law, Temple, and Vow as what they really were, and he values them as such veiy highly. This position of his becomes still more clear as we consider his attitude towards the Jexcish natron. He took over from St. Paul the theory of the predetermined hardening of the heart of the Jewish nation, and he seems here to have gone further than St. Paul, since he does not repeat the Pauline thought that still at last iraq 'la-parjk arcoOrja-erai. But upon closer consideration it will be seen that his judgment of the Jewish people is not sterner than that of St. Paul. In the first place, the disparaging « ol ^lovSaioi " of " St. John '"* is found very rarely in his writings, though it is already coming into use with 1 Yet also this may be disputed with reference to x. 35 {iv iravrl idyei
EXCURSUS IV 287 St. Paul. In spite of the theory of " final hardening," St. Luke does not regard the Jews as a massa proditionis et perditionis, but differentiates between them according to their natural and spiritual quali- ties (vide supra, pp. xxiii.j^.). Again, passages like St. Luke i. 72-79 ; ii. 31, 32, &c., show that he conceived of the Gospel as the " consolation of Israel," and that he recognised in it a twofold function : it both fulfilled the promises given to the people of Abraham Kara a-dpKa, and it was a light to the Gentiles.^ If St. Luke held this view of the Gospel it necessarily follows that a thought like that of Rom. xi. 25 f. could not have been so very far from him, or that he at least cherished similar thoughts. According to him, St. Paul contended for the Resurrection as for a hope that was common to both Jews and Christians. Above all, we must once again (vide supra, pp. 50 /.) point out that " o Xaos " (6 Xaog rov Oeov) is for St. Luke the Jewish nation. Bejbre his eyes Christendom stands in two camps—still, indeed, separate from one another first the Jewish people, that is, the pious Israelites who had accepted Jesus as the Lord ; secondly, the eOpij, who had been cifterwards called to the standard.'^ This Gentile Christian author is still very retiring, and his self-consciousness as a Gentile Christian is still un- developed. He is certain that he and his fellow 1 The canticles in St. Luke i. ii. are, in vocabulary, style, and thought, the property of St. Luke. If, however, it is thought that he received them from elsewhere, we can prove from other passages in the Lukan writings that these conceptions are Lukan. 2 St. Luke nowhere regards Jewish and Gentile Christians as bound together in such unity as is pictured in the Epistle to the Ephesians. Their separation from one another does not disturb him. —
- Page 282 and 283: 236 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of the
- Page 284 and 285: 238 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES that b
- Page 286 and 287: 240 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES quite
- Page 288 and 289: 242 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (3) El
- Page 290 and 291: 244 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of its
- Page 292 and 293: 246 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (5) Th
- Page 294 and 295: 248 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES the Ac
- Page 296 and 297: 250 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES to it
- Page 298 and 299: 252 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES and in
- Page 300 and 301: 254 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Of the
- Page 302 and 303: me THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (2) The
- Page 304 and 305: 258 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES second
- Page 306 and 307: 260 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES them.
- Page 308 and 309: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Law. This
- Page 310 and 311: EXCURSUS I SURVEY OF THE NARRATIVES
- Page 312 and 313: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES apostles;
- Page 314 and 315: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (15) Accor
- Page 316 and 317: 270 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES fidpTv
- Page 318 and 319: 27S THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES cf. %
- Page 320 and 321: ^74 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES From y
- Page 322 and 323: 276 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES We mus
- Page 324 and 325: 278 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of the
- Page 326 and 327: 280 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES serve
- Page 328 and 329: S82 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES begin
- Page 330 and 331: 284 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Lastly
- Page 334 and 335: 288 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Gentil
- Page 336 and 337: ^0 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES and to
- Page 338 and 339: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES yuaTa," no
- Page 340 and 341: 294 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES explai
- Page 342 and 343: 296 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES the "
- Page 344 and 345: CONCLUSION The truth of the descrip
- Page 346 and 347: 300 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES dealin
- Page 348 and 349: 302 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Weiss,
- Page 351 and 352: A Catalogue of Williams & N orgate'
- Page 353 and 354: — — — CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIO
- Page 355 and 356: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 7 THEOLO
- Page 357 and 358: " CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. THE CR
- Page 359 and 360: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. THE CROW
- Page 361 and 362: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. THE HIBB
- Page 363 and 364: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 15 ALPHA
- Page 365 and 366: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 17 ALPHA
- Page 367 and 368: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 19 ALPHA
- Page 369 and 370: — CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 21 A
- Page 371 and 372: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 23 ALPHA
- Page 373 and 374: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 25 ALPHA
- Page 375 and 376: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 27 ALPHA
- Page 377 and 378: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 29 MUNST
- Page 379 and 380: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 31 Also
- Page 381 and 382: CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS. 33 III.
286 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES<br />
alone,^ but for <strong>the</strong> Jews this doctrine was only neces-<br />
sary in so far as <strong>the</strong>y fell short <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fulfilment <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Law, and <strong>the</strong>refore, beside and apart from <strong>the</strong> Law,<br />
still required <strong>the</strong> forgiveness <strong>of</strong> sins in order to be<br />
quite righteous (xiii. 38, 39). On <strong>the</strong> whole St. Luke,<br />
though himself a Gentile, stands nearer than St. Paul<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Law—we may <strong>the</strong>refore also call his attitude<br />
more primitive ; for it is certainly not to be regarded<br />
as reactionary, but as <strong>the</strong> reflexion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historical<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> a time when <strong>the</strong> Jewish Christians still<br />
played a very important part, and when <strong>the</strong> Gentile<br />
Christians had not yet lost <strong>the</strong>ir reverence for <strong>the</strong><br />
religio a7itiqua, and had not yet arrived at a distinct<br />
self-consciousness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> Judaism.<br />
Though St. Luke may even give an allegorical interpretation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a passage in <strong>the</strong> Law, he still regards Law,<br />
Temple, and Vow as what <strong>the</strong>y really were, and he values<br />
<strong>the</strong>m as such veiy highly.<br />
This position <strong>of</strong> his becomes still more clear as we<br />
consider his attitude towards <strong>the</strong> Jexcish natron. He<br />
took over from St. Paul <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> predetermined<br />
hardening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jewish nation,<br />
and he seems here to have gone fur<strong>the</strong>r than St.<br />
Paul, since he does not repeat <strong>the</strong> Pauline thought<br />
that still at last iraq 'la-parjk arcoOrja-erai. But upon<br />
closer consideration it will be seen that his judgment<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jewish people is not sterner than that <strong>of</strong><br />
St. Paul. In <strong>the</strong> first place, <strong>the</strong> disparaging « ol<br />
^lovSaioi " <strong>of</strong> " St. John '"*<br />
is found very rarely in his<br />
writings, though it is already coming into use with<br />
1 Yet also this may be disputed with reference to x. 35 {iv iravrl<br />
idyei