The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
18.07.2013 Views

xxvi INTRODUCTION Moreover, it is not only the regard paid to the conduct of the Jews that brings the play of action and reaction into the narrative of the Acts ; this is also brought about in the first part of the Acts by the open acknowledgment of the fact that at the beginning not only was there no mission to the Gentiles in existence, but that at first no one had even thought of such a mission, and that it was only through a slow process of development that this mission was prepared for and established. Practic- ally all that lies written in the Acts between the sixth and the fifteenth chapters, thus more than a third part of the book, is dedicated to the demonstration of the historical problem, how it came about that there was a mission to the Gentiles at all. The longer I study the work of St. Luke the more am I astonished that this fact has not forced his critics to treat him with more respect than they show him. but not a few of them treat their own conceits in regard to the book with more respect than the grand lines of the work, which they either take as a matter of course, or criticise from the standpoint of their own superior knowledge. Yet it was by no means a matter of coarse that the as the great pioneer missionary. As a theological thinker he came out of another generation of long ago, and passed over into another generation far in the future. He was and he remained a Jew, and yet he anticipated, with his doctrine of freedom bound by Faith alone, the development of a whole epoch. The great region lying between these extreme points, with its gradual ascent, did not exist for him. His contemporaries, however, only knew this region. Like all natures of true genius, he lived in the past and in the future.

INTRODUCTION xxvii author should have raised the question : « How is it that within the Christian movement, originally Jewish, there arose a mission to the Gentiles ? "—nor that he should have at once treated it as a problem of the first importance and have exerted himself to give it an historical solution. Who else in the early Church except St. Luke, whether of his contemporaries or of a later generation, even pro- posed this problem ? And when it was proposed, who has treated it otherwise than dogmatically with the worthless and absolutely fallacious explanation that the mission to the Gentiles was already foretold in the Old Testament, and had, moreover, been expressly enjoined by our Lord ? What other idea than this is given by the Apostolic Fathers and the Apologists ? Or to say nothing of these—what else do we learn from St. Matthew and St. Mark (chap, xvi.) ? Thus, the very fact that St. Luke has raised this question, and has made its consideration a chief point of his historical work, shows an amount of historical insight which claims the highest apprecia- tion. It is, moreover, a proof that St. Luke himself had in some way taken part in this great historical development, or at least stood in some pretty close relationship to it, for what in the wide world could make a Greek of about the end of the first century feel that he ought to explain how the Gospel came to be preached to the Gentiles ; how could he have even proposed to himself such a question whose answer seemed given in the short and simple lan- guage of accomplished fact—a question which was indeed no longer a problem for consideration, but a

INTRODUCTION xxvii<br />

author should have raised <strong>the</strong> question : « How is it<br />

that within <strong>the</strong> Christian movement, originally<br />

Jewish, <strong>the</strong>re arose a mission to <strong>the</strong> Gentiles ? "—nor<br />

that he should have at once treated it as a problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first importance and have exerted himself<br />

to give it an historical solution. Who else in <strong>the</strong><br />

early Church except St. Luke, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> his<br />

contemporaries or <strong>of</strong> a later generation, even pro-<br />

posed this problem ? And when it was proposed,<br />

who has treated it o<strong>the</strong>rwise than dogmatically with<br />

<strong>the</strong> worthless and absolutely fallacious explanation<br />

that <strong>the</strong> mission to <strong>the</strong> Gentiles was already foretold<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Old Testament, and had, moreover, been<br />

expressly enjoined by our Lord ? What o<strong>the</strong>r idea<br />

than this is given by <strong>the</strong> Apostolic Fa<strong>the</strong>rs and <strong>the</strong><br />

Apologists ? Or to say nothing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se—what else<br />

do we learn from St. Mat<strong>the</strong>w and St. Mark (chap,<br />

xvi.) ? Thus, <strong>the</strong> very fact that St. Luke has raised<br />

this question, and has made its consideration a chief<br />

point <strong>of</strong> his historical work, shows an amount <strong>of</strong><br />

historical insight which claims <strong>the</strong> highest apprecia-<br />

tion. It is, moreover, a pro<strong>of</strong> that St. Luke himself<br />

had in some way taken part in this great historical<br />

development, or at least stood in some pretty close<br />

relationship to it, for what in <strong>the</strong> wide world could<br />

make a Greek <strong>of</strong> about <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first century<br />

feel that he ought to explain how <strong>the</strong> Gospel came<br />

to be preached to <strong>the</strong> Gentiles ; how could he have<br />

even proposed to himself such a question whose<br />

answer seemed given in <strong>the</strong> short and simple lan-<br />

guage <strong>of</strong> accomplished fact—a question which was<br />

indeed no longer a problem for consideration, but a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!