The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
18.07.2013 Views

242 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (3) Elsewhere in this passage, so it seems, traces are to be found of the work of an editor. (4) Such traces are also found in the passage iv. 25-31. (5) Chap. iv. 32 presents difficulties in both form and subject-matter, and does not agree with iv. 36 /. the same remark applies to iv. 34/. (6) Chap. V. 14 looks like an interpolation which breaks the thread of the context. (7) In chapter x. it seems possible to distinguish the work of an editor and a fixed text which he has worked up. (8) The same seems to be the case in xii. 1-6. Moreover, the brevity of the notice concerning the martyrdom of St. James, and of the sufl'erings of other Christians at the same time, is best explained on the assumption that the source contained stories about St. Peter, and accordingly only cursorily touched upon other subjects, however important they may have been (vide supra, p. 125). (9) The expression xii. 17: eiropevOrj ek erepov TOTTOv looks like the concluding sentence of a source, in the reproduction of which the name of the place has been suppressed. I do not think that I need weary the reader with a detailed investigation of these instances, seeing that I have not yet been able to attain to a quite complete and certain result, and have advanced only a little beyond the position which I formulated in my earlier work ("Luke the Physician," pp. 116/.). For some passages of this body of tradition it is, in my opinion, very probable that St. Luke depended ;

— WRITTEN OR ORAL SOURCES 243 upon a written document. So, above all, for chaps, iii., iv., and chap. xii. As for the former extensive passage, it is here so obvious that the name of St. John has been interpolated into a story that had already taken a fixed form, that we need only ask whether St. Luke himself inserted it or a later inter- polator. Seeing, however, that St. Luke without doubt betrays in his gospel an interest in St. Peter and St. John {vide especially xx. 8 ; the other gospels give no names here), it is precarious not to ascribe this interest also to him in the Acts. Then it would follow that the tradition of chaps, iii. and iv. lay before him in a fixed i.e. in a written—form of narrative ^ with which it would also seem necessary to com- bine chap. V. 1-11. It may, moreover, be maintained that chapter xii. depends upon a written document, both on account of its introduction, the brevity of which would be otherwise incomprehensible, and because of other phenomena it presents. It is not so probable that the passage x. 1-xi. 18 depends upon a written tradition, and such an hypothesis is quite uncertain in the case of chaps, viii. and ix. 32-43. It is not, however, necessary to imagine that because some of these passages with great probability are based upon written tradition, it therefore follows that the same hypothesis must be extended to all the rest. How- ever probable it is that the passages we have included under A form a certain homogeneous whole, it cannot be shown that in matters of form this unity is so . complete that it is not possible to suppose that some * Note also that it is only here that our Lord is called 6 vah deoO {vide $uj>ra)—an important point I

242 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES<br />

(3) Elsewhere in this passage, so it seems, traces<br />

are to be found <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> an editor.<br />

(4) Such traces are also found in <strong>the</strong> passage iv.<br />

25-31.<br />

(5) Chap. iv. 32 presents difficulties in both form<br />

and subject-matter, and does not agree with iv. 36 /.<br />

<strong>the</strong> same remark applies to iv. 34/.<br />

(6) Chap. V. 14 looks like an interpolation which<br />

breaks <strong>the</strong> thread <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> context.<br />

(7) In chapter x. it seems possible to distinguish<br />

<strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> an editor and a fixed text which he<br />

has worked up.<br />

(8) <strong>The</strong> same seems to be <strong>the</strong> case in xii. 1-6.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> brevity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notice concerning <strong>the</strong><br />

martyrdom <strong>of</strong> St. James, and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sufl'erings <strong>of</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r Christians at <strong>the</strong> same time, is best explained<br />

on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> source contained stories<br />

about St. Peter, and accordingly only cursorily touched<br />

upon o<strong>the</strong>r subjects, however important <strong>the</strong>y may have<br />

been (vide supra, p. 125).<br />

(9) <strong>The</strong> expression xii. 17: eiropevOrj ek erepov<br />

TOTTOv looks like <strong>the</strong> concluding sentence <strong>of</strong> a source,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> reproduction <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> place<br />

has been suppressed.<br />

I do not think that I need weary <strong>the</strong> reader with<br />

a detailed investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se instances, seeing that<br />

I have not yet been able to attain to a quite complete<br />

and certain result, and have advanced only a little<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> position which I formulated in my earlier<br />

work ("Luke <strong>the</strong> Physician," pp. 116/.).<br />

For some passages <strong>of</strong> this body <strong>of</strong> tradition it is,<br />

in my opinion, very probable that St. Luke depended<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!