The Acts of the Apostles
The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles
242 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (3) Elsewhere in this passage, so it seems, traces are to be found of the work of an editor. (4) Such traces are also found in the passage iv. 25-31. (5) Chap. iv. 32 presents difficulties in both form and subject-matter, and does not agree with iv. 36 /. the same remark applies to iv. 34/. (6) Chap. V. 14 looks like an interpolation which breaks the thread of the context. (7) In chapter x. it seems possible to distinguish the work of an editor and a fixed text which he has worked up. (8) The same seems to be the case in xii. 1-6. Moreover, the brevity of the notice concerning the martyrdom of St. James, and of the sufl'erings of other Christians at the same time, is best explained on the assumption that the source contained stories about St. Peter, and accordingly only cursorily touched upon other subjects, however important they may have been (vide supra, p. 125). (9) The expression xii. 17: eiropevOrj ek erepov TOTTOv looks like the concluding sentence of a source, in the reproduction of which the name of the place has been suppressed. I do not think that I need weary the reader with a detailed investigation of these instances, seeing that I have not yet been able to attain to a quite complete and certain result, and have advanced only a little beyond the position which I formulated in my earlier work ("Luke the Physician," pp. 116/.). For some passages of this body of tradition it is, in my opinion, very probable that St. Luke depended ;
— WRITTEN OR ORAL SOURCES 243 upon a written document. So, above all, for chaps, iii., iv., and chap. xii. As for the former extensive passage, it is here so obvious that the name of St. John has been interpolated into a story that had already taken a fixed form, that we need only ask whether St. Luke himself inserted it or a later inter- polator. Seeing, however, that St. Luke without doubt betrays in his gospel an interest in St. Peter and St. John {vide especially xx. 8 ; the other gospels give no names here), it is precarious not to ascribe this interest also to him in the Acts. Then it would follow that the tradition of chaps, iii. and iv. lay before him in a fixed i.e. in a written—form of narrative ^ with which it would also seem necessary to com- bine chap. V. 1-11. It may, moreover, be maintained that chapter xii. depends upon a written document, both on account of its introduction, the brevity of which would be otherwise incomprehensible, and because of other phenomena it presents. It is not so probable that the passage x. 1-xi. 18 depends upon a written tradition, and such an hypothesis is quite uncertain in the case of chaps, viii. and ix. 32-43. It is not, however, necessary to imagine that because some of these passages with great probability are based upon written tradition, it therefore follows that the same hypothesis must be extended to all the rest. How- ever probable it is that the passages we have included under A form a certain homogeneous whole, it cannot be shown that in matters of form this unity is so . complete that it is not possible to suppose that some * Note also that it is only here that our Lord is called 6 vah deoO {vide $uj>ra)—an important point I
- Page 238 and 239: 192 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES if, mo
- Page 240 and 241: 194 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES away.
- Page 242 and 243: 196 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES which
- Page 244 and 245: 198 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES detail
- Page 246 and 247: 200 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES but St
- Page 248 and 249: 202 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES author
- Page 250 and 251: 204 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES that i
- Page 252 and 253: 206 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES xvi. 2
- Page 254 and 255: 208 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES xix. 2
- Page 256 and 257: 210 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES xxiii.
- Page 258 and 259: 212 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES i. 17-
- Page 260 and 261: 214 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 4. The
- Page 262 and 263: 216 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES V. 11.
- Page 264 and 265: 218 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES xi. 15
- Page 266 and 267: 220 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES vi. 12
- Page 268 and 269: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES wardlj exp
- Page 270 and 271: ^24 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES XV. 23
- Page 272 and 273: 226 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES xix. 3
- Page 274 and 275: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES source we
- Page 276 and 277: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES On the lat
- Page 278 and 279: 232 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 26, 31
- Page 280 and 281: 234 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES source
- Page 282 and 283: 236 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of the
- Page 284 and 285: 238 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES that b
- Page 286 and 287: 240 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES quite
- Page 290 and 291: 244 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of its
- Page 292 and 293: 246 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (5) Th
- Page 294 and 295: 248 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES the Ac
- Page 296 and 297: 250 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES to it
- Page 298 and 299: 252 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES and in
- Page 300 and 301: 254 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Of the
- Page 302 and 303: me THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (2) The
- Page 304 and 305: 258 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES second
- Page 306 and 307: 260 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES them.
- Page 308 and 309: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Law. This
- Page 310 and 311: EXCURSUS I SURVEY OF THE NARRATIVES
- Page 312 and 313: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES apostles;
- Page 314 and 315: THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (15) Accor
- Page 316 and 317: 270 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES fidpTv
- Page 318 and 319: 27S THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES cf. %
- Page 320 and 321: ^74 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES From y
- Page 322 and 323: 276 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES We mus
- Page 324 and 325: 278 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of the
- Page 326 and 327: 280 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES serve
- Page 328 and 329: S82 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES begin
- Page 330 and 331: 284 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Lastly
- Page 332 and 333: 286 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES alone,
- Page 334 and 335: 288 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Gentil
- Page 336 and 337: ^0 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES and to
242 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES<br />
(3) Elsewhere in this passage, so it seems, traces<br />
are to be found <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> an editor.<br />
(4) Such traces are also found in <strong>the</strong> passage iv.<br />
25-31.<br />
(5) Chap. iv. 32 presents difficulties in both form<br />
and subject-matter, and does not agree with iv. 36 /.<br />
<strong>the</strong> same remark applies to iv. 34/.<br />
(6) Chap. V. 14 looks like an interpolation which<br />
breaks <strong>the</strong> thread <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> context.<br />
(7) In chapter x. it seems possible to distinguish<br />
<strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> an editor and a fixed text which he<br />
has worked up.<br />
(8) <strong>The</strong> same seems to be <strong>the</strong> case in xii. 1-6.<br />
Moreover, <strong>the</strong> brevity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notice concerning <strong>the</strong><br />
martyrdom <strong>of</strong> St. James, and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sufl'erings <strong>of</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r Christians at <strong>the</strong> same time, is best explained<br />
on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> source contained stories<br />
about St. Peter, and accordingly only cursorily touched<br />
upon o<strong>the</strong>r subjects, however important <strong>the</strong>y may have<br />
been (vide supra, p. 125).<br />
(9) <strong>The</strong> expression xii. 17: eiropevOrj ek erepov<br />
TOTTOv looks like <strong>the</strong> concluding sentence <strong>of</strong> a source,<br />
in <strong>the</strong> reproduction <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> place<br />
has been suppressed.<br />
I do not think that I need weary <strong>the</strong> reader with<br />
a detailed investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se instances, seeing that<br />
I have not yet been able to attain to a quite complete<br />
and certain result, and have advanced only a little<br />
beyond <strong>the</strong> position which I formulated in my earlier<br />
work ("Luke <strong>the</strong> Physician," pp. 116/.).<br />
For some passages <strong>of</strong> this body <strong>of</strong> tradition it is,<br />
in my opinion, very probable that St. Luke depended<br />
;