18.07.2013 Views

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SOURCES AND THEIR VALUE 187<br />

hiatus is explained most simply by <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> our<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sources : <strong>the</strong> account in vi. 5 belongs<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Antiochean record, while <strong>the</strong> accounts in viii.<br />

5 ff. belong to <strong>the</strong> tradition connected with both<br />

Jerusalem and Caesarea.-"- It is accordingly probable<br />

that <strong>the</strong> sections iii. 1-v. 16 and viii. 5-40 ; ix. 29-<br />

xi. 18 and xii. 1—24 belong toge<strong>the</strong>r, that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

form to a certain extent a homogeneous whole, and<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y may be described on <strong>the</strong> one hand as tradi-<br />

tion connected with both Jerusalem and Cassarea,<br />

and on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand as tradition relating both to<br />

St. Peter and St. Philip. Surveying <strong>the</strong>m we find<br />

before us a collection <strong>of</strong> traditions which is tolerably<br />

homogeneous, and which though far from being so<br />

connected and logically consistent as <strong>the</strong> Antiochean<br />

source, never<strong>the</strong>less displays certain common charac-<br />

teristics and a distinct connection in <strong>the</strong> events it<br />

records. This compilation concludes with <strong>the</strong><br />

Herodian Persecution, <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> St. James, <strong>the</strong><br />

1 So far as viii. 5 ff. is concerned it must remain quite an open<br />

question whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Philip here is <strong>the</strong> Apostle or <strong>the</strong> Evaugelist.<br />

<strong>The</strong> question is first settled in xxi. 8. <strong>The</strong> very attractive hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two Philips, for which support might easily be<br />

derived from later tradition, indeed seemingly also from <strong>the</strong> gospel<br />

<strong>of</strong> St. John, breaks down at this passage belonging to <strong>the</strong> we-sec-<br />

tions. <strong>The</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory that <strong>the</strong>re never was a Philip among <strong>the</strong> Twelve,<br />

but that <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Evangelist found its way into <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Apostles</strong>, so that he was numbered as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Twelve, presupposes<br />

a mistrust <strong>of</strong> this list which I cannot share, and which seems<br />

to me quite unjustifiable. <strong>The</strong> name " Philip " was very common,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> confusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two Philips in <strong>the</strong> second century was not<br />

only suggested by <strong>the</strong> name and <strong>the</strong> missionary activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Evangelist, but also by <strong>the</strong> highly probable fact that <strong>the</strong> Evangelist<br />

had been a personal disciple <strong>of</strong> our Lord ; for we may well assume<br />

that all <strong>the</strong> " Seven" were once personal disciples <strong>of</strong> our Lord.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!