18.07.2013 Views

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION xvii<br />

traditional material, and to regard as <strong>the</strong>ir history<br />

that which he <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>the</strong>m. In <strong>the</strong> whole under-<br />

taking and in a hundred <strong>of</strong> its details he might have<br />

made shipwreck, and his book might have sunk into<br />

oblivion ei<strong>the</strong>r without effect or condemned by<br />

Christendom. But here it remains. Perhaps only<br />

faute de mieuoc ? Certainly not ! Of course it does<br />

not satisfy all <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> later days,^ but<br />

it abides because that which is excellent is certain to<br />

succeed.^<br />

History can be narrated in two ways : one can<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>r toge<strong>the</strong>r a heap <strong>of</strong> more or less important<br />

and characteristic stories—Memorabilia ; or one can<br />

concentrate everything round a central point <strong>of</strong> in-<br />

terest. This central point can be a personality or an<br />

1 Even in early days those who gave <strong>the</strong> book <strong>the</strong> title <strong>of</strong> Upd^ets<br />

TUP diro(TTb\o}v wished to see in <strong>the</strong> book a work wherein informa-<br />

tion was preserved concerning <strong>the</strong> acts and <strong>the</strong> testimony <strong>of</strong> all<br />

<strong>the</strong> twelve <strong>Apostles</strong> ;<br />

for <strong>the</strong>re was need <strong>of</strong> such a work as a pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evangelic truth in opposition to heresy. But <strong>the</strong> book does<br />

not satisfy this requirement, or only partially so. <strong>The</strong> above title,<br />

which is generally received, and was already known to Irenseus,<br />

Clement <strong>of</strong> Alexandria, Tertullian, and <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Muratorion<br />

Fragment, cannot be original, and yet cannot have been<br />

given much later than A.D. 150. <strong>The</strong> title IT/sd^eij is only an<br />

abbreviation. <strong>The</strong> name " Commentarius Lucae," which Tertullian<br />

uses once (De Jejun. 10), though not a bad one, is a free invention<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tertullian himself.<br />

' In Gentile communities <strong>the</strong> book, so far as we know, was<br />

rejected only by <strong>the</strong> Marcionites (probably also by some Gnostic<br />

sects), and by <strong>the</strong> problematical Severians (Euseb., " Hist. Eccl.,"<br />

iv. 29 : <strong>the</strong>se are probably not to be reckoned among Gentile<br />

Christians, seeing that <strong>the</strong>y rejected 8t. Paul). In spite <strong>of</strong> TertuUian<br />

(Adv. Marc, v. 2, 3, and De Praescr., 22 /) we cannot be<br />

quite certain whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> book came into <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> Marcion ;<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are good reasons both for and against.<br />

b

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!