The Acts of the Apostles
The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles
98 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in regard to Mysia ^ (TrapeXOovreg, xvi. 8) and Bithynia (eireLpaCpv eh rrjv IBiOvviav 'jropevOrji'cih f^cu ovk eiaaev avrov
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES, AND HOUSES 99 forbidden " by the Spirit of Jesus." Finally, he was also led through Mysia without venturing to preach there, and at last arrived at Troas ; yet even here he had not reached the appointed goal, but the Spirit directed him to Macedonia. The final direction of the Spirit embodied itself in the vision by night of the Man of Macedonia. Nothing in the book approaches the conviction with which at this place the leading of the Apostle by the Spirit is pictured. In this way St. Luke heralds, not the entry of a new source, but the coming of St. Paul to Macedonia and his own meeting with St. Paul. According to Ramsay St. Luke himself was the man of Macedonia—an attractive conjecture, which had also once suggested itself to me before I knew of Ramsay's hypothesis — but it cannot be proved, and there is also much to be said against it. In its favour stands the circumstance that the appearance of the " we " at this point would receive a good explanation, and would no longer startle us like a sudden pistol-shot. It would well suit the delicacy of St. Luke's literary feeling that he should have introduced himself in this way, hinting that St. Paul learned to know him in Troas, and that God had used him as a means to bring the Apostle to Macedonia. But the thread here is too fine, and, moreover, it cannot be proved that St. Luke was at home in Macedonia. As for the unful- filled plans of the Apostle, his sudden passage from Galatia to Macedonia—without preaching in the countries on his way !—is so paradoxical that it can neither have been invented nor does it admit of a « rational " explanation. The epithet « rational "
- Page 94 and 95: 48 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES has acc
- Page 96 and 97: 50 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES VTTO 6\
- Page 98 and 99: 52 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES again x
- Page 100 and 101: 54 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES yvvrf,
- Page 102 and 103: 56 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES place (
- Page 104 and 105: 58 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES u>v €
- Page 106 and 107: 60 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES avoid b
- Page 108 and 109: 62 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of the
- Page 110 and 111: 64 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES here on
- Page 112 and 113: 66 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES which w
- Page 114 and 115: 68 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES With re
- Page 116 and 117: 70 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES describ
- Page 118 and 119: 72 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES from Ca
- Page 120 and 121: 74 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES centre
- Page 122 and 123: 76 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES says (R
- Page 124 and 125: 78 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES that th
- Page 126 and 127: 80 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in chap
- Page 128 and 129: 82 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES epfjjii
- Page 130 and 131: 84 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES concern
- Page 132 and 133: 86 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES great s
- Page 134 and 135: 88 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES view fo
- Page 136 and 137: 90 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES knowled
- Page 138 and 139: 92 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Luke wa
- Page 140 and 141: 94 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES must ne
- Page 142 and 143: 96 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES perhaps
- Page 146 and 147: — 100 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES ca
- Page 148 and 149: 102 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES are th
- Page 150 and 151: 104 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in the
- Page 152 and 153: 106 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES which
- Page 154 and 155: 108 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion b
- Page 156 and 157: 110 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Italy.
- Page 158 and 159: 112 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion f
- Page 160 and 161: 114 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 11. xv
- Page 162 and 163: 116 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES inspec
- Page 164 and 165: 118 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES book h
- Page 166 and 167: 120 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (Steph
- Page 168 and 169: 122 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES to the
- Page 170 and 171: 124 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES quarre
- Page 172 and 173: ne THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES named,
- Page 174 and 175: 128 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES by sim
- Page 176 and 177: 130 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES It is
- Page 178 and 179: 132 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES into o
- Page 180 and 181: 134 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES §
- Page 182 and 183: 136 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 1 1 !
- Page 184 and 185: 138 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 1 1 %
- Page 186 and 187: 140 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
- Page 188 and 189: 142 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES introd
- Page 190 and 191: 144 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tellig
- Page 192 and 193: 146 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES the co
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES, AND HOUSES 99<br />
forbidden " by <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> Jesus." Finally, he was<br />
also led through Mysia without venturing to preach<br />
<strong>the</strong>re, and at last arrived at Troas ;<br />
yet even here he<br />
had not reached <strong>the</strong> appointed goal, but <strong>the</strong> Spirit<br />
directed him to Macedonia. <strong>The</strong> final direction <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Spirit embodied itself in <strong>the</strong> vision by night<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Man <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Nothing in <strong>the</strong> book<br />
approaches <strong>the</strong> conviction with which at this place<br />
<strong>the</strong> leading <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostle by <strong>the</strong> Spirit is pictured.<br />
In this way St. Luke heralds, not <strong>the</strong> entry <strong>of</strong> a new<br />
source, but <strong>the</strong> coming <strong>of</strong> St. Paul to Macedonia and<br />
his own meeting with St. Paul. According to Ramsay<br />
St. Luke himself was <strong>the</strong> man <strong>of</strong> Macedonia—an<br />
attractive conjecture, which had also once suggested<br />
itself to me before I knew <strong>of</strong> Ramsay's hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />
—<br />
but it cannot be proved, and <strong>the</strong>re is also much to be<br />
said against it. In its favour stands <strong>the</strong> circumstance<br />
that <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> " we " at this point would<br />
receive a good explanation, and would no longer<br />
startle us like a sudden pistol-shot. It would well<br />
suit <strong>the</strong> delicacy <strong>of</strong> St. Luke's literary feeling that he<br />
should have introduced himself in this way, hinting<br />
that St. Paul learned to know him in Troas, and<br />
that God had used him as a means to bring <strong>the</strong><br />
Apostle to Macedonia. But <strong>the</strong> thread here is too<br />
fine, and, moreover, it cannot be proved that St.<br />
Luke was at home in Macedonia. As for <strong>the</strong> unful-<br />
filled plans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostle, his sudden passage from<br />
Galatia to Macedonia—without preaching in <strong>the</strong><br />
countries on his way !—is so paradoxical that it can<br />
nei<strong>the</strong>r have been invented nor does it admit <strong>of</strong> a<br />
« rational " explanation. <strong>The</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>t « rational "