The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles

khazarzar.skeptik.net
from khazarzar.skeptik.net More from this publisher
18.07.2013 Views

98 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in regard to Mysia ^ (TrapeXOovreg, xvi. 8) and Bithynia (eireLpaCpv eh rrjv IBiOvviav 'jropevOrji'cih f^cu ovk eiaaev avrov

LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES, AND HOUSES 99 forbidden " by the Spirit of Jesus." Finally, he was also led through Mysia without venturing to preach there, and at last arrived at Troas ; yet even here he had not reached the appointed goal, but the Spirit directed him to Macedonia. The final direction of the Spirit embodied itself in the vision by night of the Man of Macedonia. Nothing in the book approaches the conviction with which at this place the leading of the Apostle by the Spirit is pictured. In this way St. Luke heralds, not the entry of a new source, but the coming of St. Paul to Macedonia and his own meeting with St. Paul. According to Ramsay St. Luke himself was the man of Macedonia—an attractive conjecture, which had also once suggested itself to me before I knew of Ramsay's hypothesis — but it cannot be proved, and there is also much to be said against it. In its favour stands the circumstance that the appearance of the " we " at this point would receive a good explanation, and would no longer startle us like a sudden pistol-shot. It would well suit the delicacy of St. Luke's literary feeling that he should have introduced himself in this way, hinting that St. Paul learned to know him in Troas, and that God had used him as a means to bring the Apostle to Macedonia. But the thread here is too fine, and, moreover, it cannot be proved that St. Luke was at home in Macedonia. As for the unful- filled plans of the Apostle, his sudden passage from Galatia to Macedonia—without preaching in the countries on his way !—is so paradoxical that it can neither have been invented nor does it admit of a « rational " explanation. The epithet « rational "

LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES, AND HOUSES 99<br />

forbidden " by <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> Jesus." Finally, he was<br />

also led through Mysia without venturing to preach<br />

<strong>the</strong>re, and at last arrived at Troas ;<br />

yet even here he<br />

had not reached <strong>the</strong> appointed goal, but <strong>the</strong> Spirit<br />

directed him to Macedonia. <strong>The</strong> final direction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Spirit embodied itself in <strong>the</strong> vision by night<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Man <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Nothing in <strong>the</strong> book<br />

approaches <strong>the</strong> conviction with which at this place<br />

<strong>the</strong> leading <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostle by <strong>the</strong> Spirit is pictured.<br />

In this way St. Luke heralds, not <strong>the</strong> entry <strong>of</strong> a new<br />

source, but <strong>the</strong> coming <strong>of</strong> St. Paul to Macedonia and<br />

his own meeting with St. Paul. According to Ramsay<br />

St. Luke himself was <strong>the</strong> man <strong>of</strong> Macedonia—an<br />

attractive conjecture, which had also once suggested<br />

itself to me before I knew <strong>of</strong> Ramsay's hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

—<br />

but it cannot be proved, and <strong>the</strong>re is also much to be<br />

said against it. In its favour stands <strong>the</strong> circumstance<br />

that <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> " we " at this point would<br />

receive a good explanation, and would no longer<br />

startle us like a sudden pistol-shot. It would well<br />

suit <strong>the</strong> delicacy <strong>of</strong> St. Luke's literary feeling that he<br />

should have introduced himself in this way, hinting<br />

that St. Paul learned to know him in Troas, and<br />

that God had used him as a means to bring <strong>the</strong><br />

Apostle to Macedonia. But <strong>the</strong> thread here is too<br />

fine, and, moreover, it cannot be proved that St.<br />

Luke was at home in Macedonia. As for <strong>the</strong> unful-<br />

filled plans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostle, his sudden passage from<br />

Galatia to Macedonia—without preaching in <strong>the</strong><br />

countries on his way !—is so paradoxical that it can<br />

nei<strong>the</strong>r have been invented nor does it admit <strong>of</strong> a<br />

« rational " explanation. <strong>The</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>t « rational "

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!