The Acts of the Apostles
The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles
94 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES must nevertheless remain questionable whether St. Luke here was thinking of a " regio " of which Antioch, as a Roman colony, was the centre under the Roman Administration. The general significance of the word x^/^^ ^^ ^^ least equally possible here. The account of the mission in Iconium (xiv. 1—6) is quite formal in its style, and is moreover confused but from the geographical point of view it is correct that the entry into a new province should be marked at Lystra,^ and that in xiv. 19 the two cities of Antioch and Iconium, in spite of their considerable distance from one another, should be mentioned in close combination. St. Paul betakes himself in flight (xiv. 6) to the cities of Lycaonia, Lystra (rightly put first),^ and Derbe and eig t^v wepl^wpov} Ramsay {loc, cit. p. 110^.) again lays gi'eat stress upon the circumstance that the X'^P^ ^^ ^^^^ mentioned in this passage. I cannot follow him here. The very expression Trepi- Xy^po^, which is also used by St. Luke in his gospel ^ It is probably true that at this time Iconium belonged, from an administrative point of view, to Lycaonia ; but iccording to its nationality and its earlier history (Xen., Anab. i. 2, 19) it belonged to Pisidian Phrygia, and even in later times was still regarded as a Phrygian city (Acta Justini. 3 ; Firmil. in Cypr. Ep. Ixxv. 7). 2 In xvi. 1 Derbe rightly stands first, because St. Paul is coming from the south. It is straining at gnats to pay so much attention to the fact that St. Luke in xiv. 6 first mentions Lystra and Derbe together, then writes separately about Lystra and then about Derbe, and to conclude therefore that we have here different sources. 3 The description of the route and of the trials which were endured receives good attestation from 2 Tim. iii. 10 (so also the account that Timothy came from Lystra) : irapriKoXovdrjffas . . , Toii diioyfioTs, rots iradiifiaaiVj oU. fioi iyevero iv 'Avroxeig., iv 'IkovIi^, iv AOffrpois, ;
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES, AND HOUSES 95 (iii. 3; iv. 14, 37; vii. 17; viii. 37), and by St. Mark (i. 28) before him, and by St. Matthew (iii. 3 xiv. 35) along with him, of itself makes it very im- probable that he could here have had in his mind the special meaning which the word " regio " may have had for the country in question. If he had had this in his mind he would not have written rj Trepl-^^copo^, but X'^P^ ^^' another word. Lystra could be reached from Iconium in a day,^ Derbe from Lystra also in a day ; yet the latter distance was greater. Both cities were seemingly unimportant.^ St. Paul's flight thither ^ Hence in xvi. 2 " the brethren in Lystra and Iconium " could also be mentioned together. Timothy, who belonged to Lystra, was also known to, and respected by, the neighbouring Church of Iconium. The combination of these two cities is not discrepant with the other combination (xiv. 19), where Antioch and Iconium occur together {vide supra). In xvi. 2 we have a combination suggested by the mere proximity of the two cities, in xiv. 19 one probably given by the united conspiracy of the Jews of the larger cities Antioch and Iconium against the ministry of the Apostle in the whole neighbourhood. It is strange that Derbe is not mentioned in xvi. 2 : it follows that the churches of Iconium and Lystra were more closely connected than those of Derbe and Lystra, and this is explained by their greater proximity. The accuracy of the book at once strikes the reader as he considers the following combinations: (1) Lystra and Derbe are mentioned together as genuine Lycaonian cities, in distinction from the Phrygian cities Antioch and Iconium ; (2) Lystra and Iconium are mentioned together in speaking of their churches, because the cities were very near to one another, and because a notable Christian of the one church was also known to the other ; (3) Antioch and Iconium are mentioned together because the powerful bodies of Jews in those cities guarded the interests of Judaism in the whole province. 2 In xiv. 6, 21, and xvi. 1 we read Ava-rpav [in xiv. 21 ttjv A.], in xiv. 8 and xvi. 2, however, and in 2 Tim. iii. 11 Avcrpois. (The inscriptions only afford us the nominative Lustra, which decides nothing.) To conclude from this that we have here different sources is unjustifiable, and involves a strange conception of the ;
- Page 90 and 91: 44 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES ately p
- Page 92 and 93: 46 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion du
- Page 94 and 95: 48 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES has acc
- Page 96 and 97: 50 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES VTTO 6\
- Page 98 and 99: 52 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES again x
- Page 100 and 101: 54 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES yvvrf,
- Page 102 and 103: 56 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES place (
- Page 104 and 105: 58 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES u>v €
- Page 106 and 107: 60 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES avoid b
- Page 108 and 109: 62 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of the
- Page 110 and 111: 64 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES here on
- Page 112 and 113: 66 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES which w
- Page 114 and 115: 68 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES With re
- Page 116 and 117: 70 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES describ
- Page 118 and 119: 72 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES from Ca
- Page 120 and 121: 74 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES centre
- Page 122 and 123: 76 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES says (R
- Page 124 and 125: 78 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES that th
- Page 126 and 127: 80 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in chap
- Page 128 and 129: 82 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES epfjjii
- Page 130 and 131: 84 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES concern
- Page 132 and 133: 86 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES great s
- Page 134 and 135: 88 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES view fo
- Page 136 and 137: 90 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES knowled
- Page 138 and 139: 92 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Luke wa
- Page 142 and 143: 96 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES perhaps
- Page 144 and 145: 98 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in rega
- Page 146 and 147: — 100 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES ca
- Page 148 and 149: 102 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES are th
- Page 150 and 151: 104 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in the
- Page 152 and 153: 106 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES which
- Page 154 and 155: 108 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion b
- Page 156 and 157: 110 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Italy.
- Page 158 and 159: 112 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion f
- Page 160 and 161: 114 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 11. xv
- Page 162 and 163: 116 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES inspec
- Page 164 and 165: 118 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES book h
- Page 166 and 167: 120 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (Steph
- Page 168 and 169: 122 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES to the
- Page 170 and 171: 124 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES quarre
- Page 172 and 173: ne THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES named,
- Page 174 and 175: 128 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES by sim
- Page 176 and 177: 130 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES It is
- Page 178 and 179: 132 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES into o
- Page 180 and 181: 134 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES §
- Page 182 and 183: 136 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 1 1 !
- Page 184 and 185: 138 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 1 1 %
- Page 186 and 187: 140 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
- Page 188 and 189: 142 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES introd
94 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES<br />
must never<strong>the</strong>less remain questionable whe<strong>the</strong>r St.<br />
Luke here was thinking <strong>of</strong> a " regio " <strong>of</strong> which<br />
Antioch, as a Roman colony, was <strong>the</strong> centre under<br />
<strong>the</strong> Roman Administration. <strong>The</strong> general significance<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word x^/^^ ^^ ^^ least equally possible here.<br />
<strong>The</strong> account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mission in Iconium (xiv. 1—6) is<br />
quite formal in its style, and is moreover confused<br />
but from <strong>the</strong> geographical point <strong>of</strong> view it is correct<br />
that <strong>the</strong> entry into a new province should be marked<br />
at Lystra,^ and that in xiv. 19 <strong>the</strong> two cities <strong>of</strong><br />
Antioch and Iconium, in spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir considerable<br />
distance from one ano<strong>the</strong>r, should be mentioned in<br />
close combination.<br />
St. Paul betakes himself in flight (xiv. 6) to <strong>the</strong><br />
cities <strong>of</strong> Lycaonia, Lystra (rightly put first),^ and<br />
Derbe and eig t^v wepl^wpov} Ramsay {loc, cit. p.<br />
110^.) again lays gi'eat stress upon <strong>the</strong> circumstance<br />
that <strong>the</strong> X'^P^ ^^ ^^^^ mentioned in this passage. I<br />
cannot follow him here. <strong>The</strong> very expression Trepi-<br />
Xy^po^, which is also used by St. Luke in his gospel<br />
^ It is probably true that at this time Iconium belonged, from an<br />
administrative point <strong>of</strong> view, to Lycaonia ; but iccording to its<br />
nationality and its earlier history (Xen., Anab. i. 2, 19) it belonged<br />
to Pisidian Phrygia, and even in later times was still regarded as a<br />
Phrygian city (Acta Justini. 3 ;<br />
Firmil. in Cypr. Ep. Ixxv. 7).<br />
2 In xvi. 1 Derbe rightly stands first, because St. Paul is coming<br />
from <strong>the</strong> south. It is straining at gnats to pay so much attention<br />
to <strong>the</strong> fact that St. Luke in xiv. 6 first mentions Lystra and Derbe<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>n writes separately about Lystra and <strong>the</strong>n about Derbe,<br />
and to conclude <strong>the</strong>refore that we have here different sources.<br />
3 <strong>The</strong> description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> route and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trials which were<br />
endured receives good attestation from 2 Tim. iii. 10 (so also <strong>the</strong><br />
account that Timothy came from Lystra) : irapriKoXovdrjffas . . ,<br />
Toii diioyfioTs, rots iradiifiaaiVj oU. fioi iyevero iv 'Avroxeig., iv 'IkovIi^,<br />
iv AOffrpois,<br />
;