The Acts of the Apostles
The Acts of the Apostles The Acts of the Apostles
74 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES centre of the movement soon after the Crucifixion of our Lord.^ Judaea is more frequently mentioned in the book. There, and indeed eV Traa-u t^ 'lovSaia, the disciples are to bear witness (i. 8). The adherents of Stephen are scattered Kara tol^ \(jopa^ TtJ9 'lovSaiag (viii. 1), i.e. throughout the Holy Land (vide mpra sub x^P^)- With the phrases eKK\t]G-La KaO' o\t]9 rrjg Tof^a/a? (ix. 31),^ and aS€\(po] 01 oi/Teg Kara rrjv ^lovSalav (xi. 1), and KaroiKovvreg ev rfj 'lovSala aSeXipol (xi. 29), we may compare Gal. i. 22 : ai eKKXtjciai r^? 'lovSaiag and 1 Thess. ii. 14 ai €KK\r](Tiai at ouaai ev r^ ^lovSala. It is noteworthy that St. Luke realises that Caesarea does not belong to Judaea in the proper sense of the word ; in xii. 19 and XXi. 10 he writes KareXOwv oltto rrjg 'lovSalag e/'y rLaiaraplav and KarrjXOh ng otto t^? ^lovSaiag irpocbrjTrjg \eh }^aLarapLav'\ respectively—note the coincidence here; XXi. 10 stands in a we-section— ; but already, from viii. 26-40; ix. 32^. one recognises that St. Luke did not count Caesarea and the whole belt of Philistian cities as belonging to Judsea, and yet he has no inclusive name for the region ; in viii. 40 he writes : 1 In the history of the Church the expectation of the near approach of the "Kingdom" has always had as a corollary the assembling of believers at one single place. We may accordingly assume that after the first appearances of our Lord in Galilee all or almost all of His adherents betook themselves to Jerusalem, where it was expected that the "Kingdom" would be revealed. Hence Galilee passed at once quite into the background (St. Paul speaks only of Churches in Judaea), and hence it is also explained why it happened that the first appearances of the Risen Christ in Galilee were replaced by appearances in Jerusalem. It was afterwards that churches gradu:illy formed themselves in Galilee. 2 The same expression : Kad' SXrji ttjx 'lovSat'as occurs also in x. 37. :
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES, AND HOUSES 75 ^i\nnro9 evpeOt] ei^^Al^wrov, Koi Si€p-)(^6/ui€V09 €vt]yy€- Xil^ero rag TroAet? Tracra? ecog tov eXOeiv avTOv ef? K.aLarapiav, and in ix. 32: iyevero Uerpov Siep-)(o- fxevov Si a ttolvtcov [scil. all the brethren in the cities of the Philistian coast] KaTeXOeiv kol ttjOO? tov^ ayiov^ Tovg KaroiKOvvra^ Afooa. Judaea occurs in some passages where we should expect Jerusalem, and vice versa ; but this is scarcely due to inaccuracy. That the Christian communities of Judaea in the first days, and for some considerable time, were only relatively independent, indeed were for the most part dependent upon the Church of Jerusalem, and were, one might say, really identical with that Church, is a fact which can be deduced from the Pauline epistles, and which answers to the natural course of development of all such organisar- tions : the mother community remained at first " the Church," the rest were only in dependent filial rela- tionship to her. St. Luke thus shows himself well- informed when in the cases in question he writes Jerusalem for Judaea, and vice versd. It is, however, believed that it can be proved that the author has made a mistake in writing Judaea in xxvi. 20 : St. Paul did not preach, as St. Luke makes him say, in Judaea, not at least iv iraa-n t^ X^p^ 't*]^ 'lovSaiag. It cannot, in fact, be proved that he did preach in Judaea, and before the time mentioned in Gal. i. 22 he cannot have done so ; but why may he not have proclaimed the Gospel in this region on the occasion of later visits when he was journeying from Antioch or Caesarea to Jerusalem ? For this ministry days, not weeks, were quite sufficient, and he himself
- Page 70 and 71: 24 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES xiii. 3
- Page 72 and 73: 26 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES would f
- Page 74 and 75: 28 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (xv. 36
- Page 76 and 77: 30 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES compare
- Page 78 and 79: 32 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES XVi. 12
- Page 80 and 81: 34 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES We may
- Page 82 and 83: 36 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES whom th
- Page 84 and 85: 38 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES and the
- Page 86 and 87: 40 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES inner l
- Page 88 and 89: 42 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion pa
- Page 90 and 91: 44 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES ately p
- Page 92 and 93: 46 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion du
- Page 94 and 95: 48 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES has acc
- Page 96 and 97: 50 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES VTTO 6\
- Page 98 and 99: 52 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES again x
- Page 100 and 101: 54 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES yvvrf,
- Page 102 and 103: 56 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES place (
- Page 104 and 105: 58 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES u>v €
- Page 106 and 107: 60 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES avoid b
- Page 108 and 109: 62 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES of the
- Page 110 and 111: 64 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES here on
- Page 112 and 113: 66 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES which w
- Page 114 and 115: 68 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES With re
- Page 116 and 117: 70 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES describ
- Page 118 and 119: 72 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES from Ca
- Page 122 and 123: 76 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES says (R
- Page 124 and 125: 78 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES that th
- Page 126 and 127: 80 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in chap
- Page 128 and 129: 82 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES epfjjii
- Page 130 and 131: 84 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES concern
- Page 132 and 133: 86 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES great s
- Page 134 and 135: 88 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES view fo
- Page 136 and 137: 90 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES knowled
- Page 138 and 139: 92 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Luke wa
- Page 140 and 141: 94 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES must ne
- Page 142 and 143: 96 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES perhaps
- Page 144 and 145: 98 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in rega
- Page 146 and 147: — 100 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES ca
- Page 148 and 149: 102 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES are th
- Page 150 and 151: 104 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES in the
- Page 152 and 153: 106 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES which
- Page 154 and 155: 108 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion b
- Page 156 and 157: 110 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES Italy.
- Page 158 and 159: 112 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES tion f
- Page 160 and 161: 114 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 11. xv
- Page 162 and 163: 116 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES inspec
- Page 164 and 165: 118 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES book h
- Page 166 and 167: 120 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES (Steph
- Page 168 and 169: 122 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES to the
74 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES<br />
centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> movement soon after <strong>the</strong> Crucifixion<br />
<strong>of</strong> our Lord.^<br />
Judaea is more frequently mentioned in <strong>the</strong> book.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re, and indeed eV Traa-u t^ 'lovSaia, <strong>the</strong> disciples are<br />
to bear witness (i. 8). <strong>The</strong> adherents <strong>of</strong> Stephen are<br />
scattered Kara tol^ \(jopa^ TtJ9 'lovSaiag (viii. 1), i.e.<br />
throughout <strong>the</strong> Holy Land (vide mpra sub x^P^)- With<br />
<strong>the</strong> phrases eKK\t]G-La KaO' o\t]9 rrjg T<strong>of</strong>^a/a? (ix. 31),^ and<br />
aS€\(po] 01 oi/Teg Kara rrjv ^lovSalav (xi. 1), and KaroiKovvreg<br />
ev rfj 'lovSala aSeXipol (xi. 29), we may compare<br />
Gal. i. 22 : ai eKKXtjciai r^? 'lovSaiag and 1 <strong>The</strong>ss. ii. 14<br />
ai €KK\r](Tiai at ouaai ev r^ ^lovSala. It is noteworthy<br />
that St. Luke realises that Caesarea does not belong<br />
to Judaea in <strong>the</strong> proper sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word ; in xii. 19<br />
and XXi. 10 he writes KareXOwv oltto rrjg 'lovSalag e/'y<br />
rLaiaraplav and KarrjXOh ng otto t^? ^lovSaiag irpocbrjTrjg<br />
\eh }^aLarapLav'\ respectively—note <strong>the</strong> coincidence<br />
here; XXi. 10 stands in a we-section— ; but already,<br />
from viii. 26-40; ix. 32^. one recognises that St.<br />
Luke did not count Caesarea and <strong>the</strong> whole belt <strong>of</strong><br />
Philistian cities as belonging to Judsea, and yet he has<br />
no inclusive name for <strong>the</strong> region ; in viii. 40 he writes :<br />
1 In <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>the</strong> expectation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> near<br />
approach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "Kingdom" has always had as a corollary <strong>the</strong><br />
assembling <strong>of</strong> believers at one single place. We may accordingly<br />
assume that after <strong>the</strong> first appearances <strong>of</strong> our Lord in Galilee all or<br />
almost all <strong>of</strong> His adherents betook <strong>the</strong>mselves to Jerusalem, where<br />
it was expected that <strong>the</strong> "Kingdom" would be revealed. Hence<br />
Galilee passed at once quite into <strong>the</strong> background (St. Paul speaks<br />
only <strong>of</strong> Churches in Judaea), and hence it is also explained why it<br />
happened that <strong>the</strong> first appearances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Risen Christ in Galilee<br />
were replaced by appearances in Jerusalem. It was afterwards that<br />
churches gradu:illy formed <strong>the</strong>mselves in Galilee.<br />
2 <strong>The</strong> same expression : Kad' SXrji ttjx 'lovSat'as occurs also in x. 37.<br />
: