BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek
BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek
BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
was conducted, neither of these plans had.been implemented. However, a<br />
number of projects on the local level existed, partly because of the<br />
larger planning process and partly in spite of it. The reasons for this<br />
contradictory situation lie in the conflicts between central decision-making<br />
structures and projects striving for autonomy. Without a larger degree of<br />
autonomy at the local level, the complex problems of co-ordination cannot<br />
be solved. The central or top level administrator, however, tries to<br />
retain his influence, in order to balance resources on a city-wide scale.<br />
103. The South Arsenal Neighborhood . Development (S<strong>AND</strong>) project, one of<br />
the tangible results of the Greater Hartford Process and community efforts,<br />
provides a case in point: S<strong>AND</strong>'s ability to help the neighbourhood to<br />
plan for its own needs and aspirations, and to gain financial support from<br />
various sources, precisely responded to the goals of the Greater Hartford<br />
Process. For this reason, it gained wide-spread support. At the same<br />
time, S<strong>AND</strong>'s tendency to create a city within a city was perceived by<br />
Hartford's central governmental agencies as a threat, because of its<br />
potential for creating a new type of balkanised metropolitan area if<br />
followed by other communities. For this reason it suffered delays in its<br />
implementation. After nearly one decade, a balance now seems to have been<br />
found between these two extremes which are typical for a locally initiated<br />
and directed, yet centrally endorsed, project.<br />
104. The S<strong>AND</strong> project, once the Everywhere School and its community<br />
facilities have been built, will be an interesting testing ground for the<br />
assumption that large problems and issues hold a neighbourhood together,<br />
in fact produce a "community" where, beforehand, there existed only a<br />
catchment area, populated by families without a common interest. Again,<br />
this may depend on how much further support will be extended from the<br />
central level and on what will happen to the local leaders who have been<br />
continuously involved in the project over the last ten years.<br />
105. As will be seen in Ann Arbor, a new central administration which is<br />
geared to a different set of goals and objectives, may cause local leaders<br />
to resign and local input to diminish once the school has been built. The<br />
Ann Arbor city-wide educational planning process in the years 1971-73, had<br />
no precedent. It became a prototype which achieved a lot and failed a lot,<br />
within a fairly short period of time:<br />
- five schools were planned and built as part'of an overall plan and<br />
with considerable participation of the community;<br />
- a comprehensive master plan was developed for the Board of<br />
Education, the only metropolitan agency;<br />
85