BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek
BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek
BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
communication between the central decision-making body and the local<br />
school is close, e.g. two of the oldest community-school areas: Flint,<br />
Michigan and New Haven, Connecticut. A third more recent example of<br />
community education exists in one of the few still growing communities<br />
in the country, East Windsor, New Jersey. One common trait of all three<br />
examples is a long standing history of co-operation between various<br />
agencies which, in the first two cases, have led to an early use of<br />
schools for community services and, in the latter, to a more recent move<br />
towards the integrated provision of services. Another characteristic is<br />
the dominance of educational and recreational uses as evidenced in the<br />
various program brochures. As was found in Part One, the acceptability<br />
of integrating education and recreation eliminates the conflicts which<br />
arise in the co-ordination of traditionally less compatible uses. Included<br />
in the latter category are health, welfare and judicial agencies which<br />
have been co-ordinated in the larger urban areas and metropolitan regions<br />
through the interventionist approach.<br />
100. Both Hartford and Ann Arbor count among the interventionist examples,<br />
as they offer community school models which have come into being as part<br />
of larger urban planning processes. In both cases the co-ordination of<br />
school and community facilities is seen as one important way of upgrading<br />
the urban environment. In both, citizens have been involved in the<br />
planning processes, and new organisational and architectural models have<br />
been developed. Another characteristic, common to both, has been the<br />
eruption of deep rooted conflicts during the planning processes.<br />
101. The "Greater Hartford Process", a guideline report for the coordination<br />
of resources and needs in the greater Hartford region, states the<br />
initial problem In the following way:<br />
"American cities have traditionally lacked a way to deal with their<br />
problems. Public and private interests have been locked into their<br />
separate jurisdictions, powerless to attack the problems that respect<br />
no such boundary. We have lacked a process enabling us to work<br />
together across all boundaries - public and private, town and city,<br />
black and white, rich and poor. No group can do the job alone,<br />
although any group can stop it. Nothing good will happen unless<br />
people want it to happen and believe it can happen."(1)<br />
102. Hartford and Ann Arbor began to attack the problems of co-ordination<br />
by developing comprehensive master plans for urban and educational development<br />
in the late 60's and early 70's. In 1976, when the present study<br />
1) "The Greater Hartford Process", a report by the American City Corporation,<br />
a subsidiary of the Rouse Company, April 1972, page 11.<br />
84