18.07.2013 Views

BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek

BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek

BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

communication between the central decision-making body and the local<br />

school is close, e.g. two of the oldest community-school areas: Flint,<br />

Michigan and New Haven, Connecticut. A third more recent example of<br />

community education exists in one of the few still growing communities<br />

in the country, East Windsor, New Jersey. One common trait of all three<br />

examples is a long standing history of co-operation between various<br />

agencies which, in the first two cases, have led to an early use of<br />

schools for community services and, in the latter, to a more recent move<br />

towards the integrated provision of services. Another characteristic is<br />

the dominance of educational and recreational uses as evidenced in the<br />

various program brochures. As was found in Part One, the acceptability<br />

of integrating education and recreation eliminates the conflicts which<br />

arise in the co-ordination of traditionally less compatible uses. Included<br />

in the latter category are health, welfare and judicial agencies which<br />

have been co-ordinated in the larger urban areas and metropolitan regions<br />

through the interventionist approach.<br />

100. Both Hartford and Ann Arbor count among the interventionist examples,<br />

as they offer community school models which have come into being as part<br />

of larger urban planning processes. In both cases the co-ordination of<br />

school and community facilities is seen as one important way of upgrading<br />

the urban environment. In both, citizens have been involved in the<br />

planning processes, and new organisational and architectural models have<br />

been developed. Another characteristic, common to both, has been the<br />

eruption of deep rooted conflicts during the planning processes.<br />

101. The "Greater Hartford Process", a guideline report for the coordination<br />

of resources and needs in the greater Hartford region, states the<br />

initial problem In the following way:<br />

"American cities have traditionally lacked a way to deal with their<br />

problems. Public and private interests have been locked into their<br />

separate jurisdictions, powerless to attack the problems that respect<br />

no such boundary. We have lacked a process enabling us to work<br />

together across all boundaries - public and private, town and city,<br />

black and white, rich and poor. No group can do the job alone,<br />

although any group can stop it. Nothing good will happen unless<br />

people want it to happen and believe it can happen."(1)<br />

102. Hartford and Ann Arbor began to attack the problems of co-ordination<br />

by developing comprehensive master plans for urban and educational development<br />

in the late 60's and early 70's. In 1976, when the present study<br />

1) "The Greater Hartford Process", a report by the American City Corporation,<br />

a subsidiary of the Rouse Company, April 1972, page 11.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!