18.07.2013 Views

BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek

BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek

BUILDING FOR SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY - Kennedy Bibliothek

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the study, depends largely on the administration of the center and<br />

whether or not its leadership pursues this goal. If those preconditions<br />

are met, physical integration does become an asset.<br />

The second assumption holds that the provision of large school<br />

facilities combining several previously separated schools with other<br />

social services will help to achieve racial and social integration and<br />

ameliorate socio-economic problems. The most remarkable example for<br />

racial integration found, is the Thomas Jefferson Junior High School<br />

and Community Center in Arlington, Virginia. It was the only place<br />

where black and white people mixed in educational and recreational<br />

programs, due probably to the middle-class structure and international<br />

mix of residents in this suburb of Washington, D„C„ The Paul Laurence<br />

Dunbar Community High School, Baltimore, Maryland, a totally black<br />

ghetto community/school center has not even attempted racial<br />

integration. In Pontiac, Michigan, following the implementation<br />

of the Dana Whitmer Human Resources Center, five years of continuing<br />

"out migration" of white residents have been followed by one year of<br />

trend reversal. It is difficult to determine if this development is<br />

due to the Human Resources Center or the present economic crisis.<br />

A third major reason for combining services is that this will<br />

produce more economical solutions in terms of capital outlay, maintenance<br />

and running costs as compared to providing these services<br />

separately. To begin with, certainly, none of the three large centers<br />

is particularly cheap. A fiscal analysis and reappraisal of original<br />

cost estimates in view of today's experiences is available only for<br />

the Human Resources Center in Pontiac. One way of analysing costs<br />

results in savings of more than $380 000 by combining facilities<br />

over what it would have cost if built separately. It does not<br />

include, however, an analysis of maintenance and running costs and<br />

only touches on the question of trade-offs.<br />

A fourth assumption relates to participation of users and citizens<br />

in the planning and programming process. It can be shown, beyond<br />

a doubt, that an early and direct involvement of users is not only<br />

useful but necessary if the center is to be run in a truly cooperative<br />

fashion.<br />

A fifth assumption, relating'to innovative architectural design<br />

solutions as a result of agency and citizen involvement, must be<br />

refuted. All three planning processes involved the bureaucracy and<br />

the population; however, only one center can be termed architecturally<br />

innovative. For the subsequent functioning of the center, the<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!