18.07.2013 Views

in the court of appeal malaysia (appellate jurisdiction)

in the court of appeal malaysia (appellate jurisdiction)

in the court of appeal malaysia (appellate jurisdiction)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors meet<strong>in</strong>g that took place on 17.11.2003 <strong>the</strong><br />

members (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> directors from <strong>the</strong> petitioner) unanimously agreed<br />

that <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1 st respondent be <strong>in</strong>structed to request auditors to<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> verification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> said advance <strong>of</strong> RM3.78 million and <strong>the</strong><br />

alleged stock losses as part and parcel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forthcom<strong>in</strong>g annual audit for<br />

<strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year end<strong>in</strong>g 31.12.2003. There was a delay <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>struct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

auditors due to <strong>the</strong> fact that at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Board members felt <strong>the</strong> fees<br />

requested by <strong>the</strong> auditors were on <strong>the</strong> high side. Eventually <strong>the</strong> auditors<br />

agreed to do <strong>the</strong> verification on an agreed fee. The “Report on Verifications<br />

<strong>of</strong> Stock Loss and Advances from Ngiu Kee Sdn Bhd” was completed on<br />

17.9.2004. It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that even before <strong>the</strong> report was completed<br />

<strong>the</strong> petitioner proceeded to <strong>the</strong> file <strong>the</strong> present petition. This was completely<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Board’s unanimous decision to wait for <strong>the</strong> report before any<br />

action could be taken. The evidence shows that accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> auditor’s<br />

report, <strong>the</strong> stock loss and <strong>the</strong> advance had been verified and <strong>the</strong>re should not<br />

be any more grievances by <strong>the</strong> petitioner. Instead <strong>of</strong> wait<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong><br />

auditor’s report to be f<strong>in</strong>alized, <strong>the</strong> petitioner filed <strong>the</strong> present petition. In<br />

our view, when <strong>the</strong> petitioner filed <strong>the</strong> petition, it was a total disregard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

unanimous decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors and total disregard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

parties’ <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!