THE PALACE OF JUSTICE CIVIL APPEAL NO. P-02-2074-2011 ...
THE PALACE OF JUSTICE CIVIL APPEAL NO. P-02-2074-2011 ...
THE PALACE OF JUSTICE CIVIL APPEAL NO. P-02-2074-2011 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
caused them financial loss as they could not move in into the<br />
industrial buildings that they had purchased and to commence their<br />
business operations.<br />
The respondents allege that this delay was due to the professional<br />
negligence on the part of the appellants.<br />
At the High Court the learned High Court Judge made a peculiar<br />
finding: he found the appellants liable in negligence, but, only to the<br />
extent of 50%. However, we will say more of this peculiarity later at<br />
the end of this judgment. He ordered damages to be assessed. The<br />
learned High Court Judge made a finding that there was a breach of<br />
duty of care on the part of the appellants, as the architects of the<br />
project, by reason of –<br />
(a) being negligent in the preparation of the original layout<br />
plan such that the original layout plan had to be amended;<br />
and<br />
12