bidang kuasa rayuan - Laman Web Rasmi Pejabat Ketua Pendaftar ...

5
10
15
20
25
that there is no evidence to support such allegation. It is
based on suspicion or conjecture. The Code does not
require the State Authority to give reasons for the said
revocation. There is no express provision to that effect.
Nevertheless, the second respondent in his affidavit-in-reply
explained, among others, that the revocation was due to the
need to maintain forest sustainability and this view was
formed after having considered the various technical reports
from the relevant departments. It must be noted that the
land approved in principle for alienation was in fact a
permanent forest reserve. The revocation such forest
reserved land would in fact reduced the size of forest
reserved land in the state, which could have adverse effect
on the ecosystem and natural habitat in the state.
Legitimate expectation
[31] The basis of the appellant‟s contention that it had a
legitimate expectation that qualified titles to the said lots
would be issued is based on the facts that the State
Authority had approved the alienation of the said land to it
and that it had duly paid the sum due pursuant to Form 5A
notices within time. Section 80(3) of the Code provides
that upon payment of all fees the Registrar shall prepare,
register and issue a qualified title in respect of the land. It
23