18.07.2013 Views

A comparison of wi-fi and wimax with case studies - Florida State ...

A comparison of wi-fi and wimax with case studies - Florida State ...

A comparison of wi-fi and wimax with case studies - Florida State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for the channel, timing <strong>and</strong> <strong>fi</strong>ne frequency <strong>of</strong>fset estimation. The Head contains two parts, the<br />

signal <strong>and</strong> data’s service section. The head is 40 bits long (signal is 24 bits plus service 16 bits).<br />

The signal <strong>fi</strong>eld is always transmitted <strong>wi</strong>th BPSK at 6 Mbps.<br />

Figure 3-11 OFDM PLCP Structure<br />

In the OFDM-PMD sub-layer, to maintain the speed 6, 12 <strong>and</strong> 24 Mbps is required. An<br />

operation channel (20 MHz b<strong>and</strong><strong>wi</strong>dth) is divided into 52 sub-channels (sub-carriers). Four <strong>of</strong><br />

them are pilot carriers; the rest <strong>of</strong> the 48 sub-channels are used to transmit data. The data <strong>wi</strong>ll be<br />

divided <strong>and</strong> modulated into sub-channels, then transmitted parallel. [17][21][29]<br />

3.3.1.6. IEEE 802.11g <strong>and</strong> the Physical Layer<br />

3.3.1.6.1. Background <strong>and</strong> Backward Compatibility<br />

As 802.11b became more <strong>and</strong> more popular, people started to notice the convenience <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>wi</strong>reless LAN. At that time, 802.11b could only provide a maximum 11Mbps. Compared to<br />

Ethernet, this was not a good performance – it was just barely acceptable. When 802.11a started<br />

to join the market, end users also wanted 802.11b to become faster. In fact, 54 Mbps really was<br />

not very fast <strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the time, in a wonderful environment, the performance could only<br />

achieve 50% <strong>of</strong> the possible speed. However WLAN has its own advantages <strong>and</strong> “<strong>wi</strong>reless” has<br />

become a trend gradually. Under these conditions, 802.11g is the answer. It has the same speed<br />

<strong>wi</strong>th 802.11a, but it has a longer area <strong>of</strong> coverage. Moreover, it operates in the 2.4 GHz b<strong>and</strong>.<br />

According to 802.11g clause, this st<strong>and</strong>ard is not a “new” st<strong>and</strong>ard. It is an integrated<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard using many existing technologies. Its physical layer is called ERP (Extended Rate PHY)<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!