The 1536 Dissolution of the Lesser Monasteries: Same Suppression ...
The 1536 Dissolution of the Lesser Monasteries: Same Suppression ...
The 1536 Dissolution of the Lesser Monasteries: Same Suppression ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Benedictine order. 49 <strong>The</strong>re also appeared to be no prior, so monk James Burton was appointed<br />
administrator and instructed to make a full account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> house and its inventory. O<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong><br />
lack <strong>of</strong> a prior and pre-pr<strong>of</strong>essed monks <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r houses, Folkestone appeared to be in fine<br />
shape. 50 <strong>The</strong> monks having been pr<strong>of</strong>essed to o<strong>the</strong>r orders may be a sign that <strong>the</strong>y had problems<br />
committing to <strong>the</strong>ir rules, but sources do not say why <strong>the</strong> monks changed orders.<br />
Some visitation records <strong>of</strong> Folkestone reveal a decline in <strong>the</strong> high principles <strong>of</strong><br />
monasticism in that house as well, while o<strong>the</strong>rs report <strong>the</strong> house as being in a good shape. In<br />
1491, Archbishop Morton appointed a commission to look into <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prior. <strong>The</strong><br />
commission found and charged <strong>the</strong> prior ―with various excesses and dishonest appropriations <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> goods <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Priory, and in 1493 was deprived.‖ 51 Folkestone <strong>the</strong>n surrendered on 15<br />
November 1535, a year prior to <strong>the</strong> passing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> suppression act <strong>of</strong> <strong>1536</strong>. <strong>The</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
house had increased over time, being worth annually £26 1s 8d during <strong>the</strong> reign <strong>of</strong> Richard II,<br />
and £41 15s 10d at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dissolution</strong>. 52 <strong>The</strong> house – consisting <strong>of</strong> one hall, one chamber, a<br />
kitchen and a parlour underground – was claimed to be in utter decay, with only two religious, a<br />
prior and sick monk both <strong>of</strong> whom were guilty <strong>of</strong> serious <strong>of</strong>fences. <strong>The</strong> prior at <strong>the</strong> time was<br />
Thomas Barrett Bassett, and he received a pension <strong>of</strong> £10 a year, which he was reportedly still<br />
receiving in 1553. Folkestone was received by Thomas Bedyll, who interestingly enough<br />
reported <strong>the</strong> house to be well repaired, and <strong>the</strong> prior a good husband beloved by his neighbours.<br />
Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> house was actually in disrepair, or if Bedyll correctly reported on <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong><br />
49 K.L. Wood-Legh, Kentish Visitations <strong>of</strong> Archbishop William Warham and His Deputies, 1511-1512 (Kent:<br />
Archaeological Society, 1984), 28; ―Priory <strong>of</strong> Folkestone,‖ BHO.<br />
50 ―Priory <strong>of</strong> Folkestone.‖<br />
51 Mackie, A Handbook <strong>of</strong> Folkestone, 6; Woodward, <strong>The</strong> Past and Present <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parish Church <strong>of</strong> Folkestone,<br />
32. 52 ―Priory <strong>of</strong> Folkestone‖; Dugdale; Mackie, A Handbook <strong>of</strong> Folkestone, 5.<br />
42