Question - Faculty of Arts - University of Waterloo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Students’ Answers Made use of resources previously unknown to them Provided too much information – Cut-and-paste – didn’t summarize – Lack confidence to know what information is important 30
Was James Satisfied? Again: Is a prof ever really satisfied? Students saw advantage of using UW Library resources, but thought task was too long Future offerings – replace chart with CMS short answer form 31
Page 1 and 2: Embedding Information Literacy in t
Page 3 and 4: Tempo - Germany’s premium tissue!
Page 5 and 6: University of Waterloo: Statistics
Page 7 and 8: New Issues and Implications Course
Page 9 and 10: Students would be able to James’
Page 11 and 12: Why Use CMS to Deliver InfoLit? In
Page 13 and 14: Question The co-operation outlined
Page 15 and 16: Information What Did We Do? - Chart
Page 18 and 19: 1. Students read the topic. 2. Stud
Page 20 and 21: Automatic feedback is brief since i
Page 22 and 23: Did Students Engage with the Materi
Page 24 and 25: The Students’ Answers Relied on
Page 26 and 27: Was James Satisfied? Is a prof eve
Page 28 and 29: Instructional challenge - Independe
Page 32 and 33: Instructional Challenge - Poor rese
Page 34 and 35: Course objectives highlight the imp
Page 36 and 37: Scaffolded InfoLit: Content 1. Stud
Page 38 and 39: Scaffolded InfoLit: Application 3.
Page 40 and 41: This is a special “Tempo with Lot
Page 42 and 43: Feedback: Students Saw Value . . .
Page 44 and 45: Feedback: Students Saw No Value . .
Page 46 and 47: Final Question Our approach has be
Page 48: University of Waterloo Acknowledgem

Question - Faculty of Arts - University of Waterloo

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?