17.07.2013 Views

Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...

Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...

Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kaua’i <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> Cooperative<br />

<strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessments</strong><br />

3.0 <strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Options<br />

Applications<br />

RDF is preferred in many refuse to energy applications because it can be<br />

combusted with technology traditionally used for coal. Spreader stoker fired boilers,<br />

suspension fired boilers, fluidized bed boilers, and cyclone furnace units have all been<br />

utilized to generate steam from RDF. Fluidized bed combustors are often preferred for<br />

RDF energy applications due to their high combustion efficiency, capability to handle<br />

RDF with minimal processing, and inherent ability to effectively reduce nitrous oxide<br />

and sulfur dioxide emissions. In all MSW or RDF boiler types, the boiler tube metal<br />

temperature must be kept at a temperature less than 800ºF to minimize boiler tube<br />

degradation due to chlorine compounds in the flue gas.<br />

There are 15 operating refuse derived fuel plants in the United States with an<br />

annual capacity to process 6.2 million tons of waste. Typical RDF facilities process 500<br />

to 2,000 tons of RDF per day (the average amount produced by 200,000 to 800,000<br />

residents). The average design capacity of RDF plants operating in the US is about 1,330<br />

tons per day of waste. 31<br />

Cost and Performance Characteristics<br />

Table 3-14 has typical ranges for performance and costs for a 300 ton per day<br />

RDF facility.<br />

Environmental Impacts<br />

RDF faces the same environmental opposition as MSW while providing the same<br />

environmental benefits. RDF plants are generally viewed as being more compatible with<br />

recycling efforts. RDF plants using fluidized bed technology can potentially achieve<br />

lower emissions than mass burn plants.<br />

<strong>Kauai</strong> Outlook<br />

Like MSW mass burn, RDF is a potentially promising option for <strong>Kauai</strong>.<br />

Resource availability and developable potential is essentially the same as was previously<br />

discussed in the MSW mass burn section. RDF technology is commercial technology,<br />

but has not been used in as many applications due to its higher cost. The technology does<br />

allow for greater recovery of recyclable materials and the potential for lower emissions.<br />

Finally, an RDF plant could readily burn other biomass fuels, especially if it was based<br />

on fluidized bed combustion technology.<br />

31 Integrated Waste Services Association, 2004.<br />

21 March 2005 3-37 Black & Veatch

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!