Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ... Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative Renewable Energy Technology Assessments 9.0 Wind Analyses yielded an approximate capacity factor of 36 percent at 50 meters on the anemometer site for an annual energy yield of 21 GWh. Figure 9-10 shows power consumption for a Thursday in April 1996 with projected power production from a 6.6 MW Hanapepe project. Projected output from this ridgeline site has a fairly flat profile through all seasons. Wind Capacity Factor 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Winter Spring Summer Fall Load: Thurs. April 4, 1996 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Figure 9-10. Diurnal and Seasonal Capacity Factor with KIUC Summer Loads and Project Output, Hanapepe Area. Anahola Anahola site performance estimates were made using the using 27 m (90 ft) anemometer data scaled up to 50 meters using a wind sheer factor of 0.1 (appropriate for ridgline terrain). The data was then further scaled to the better wind on the ridge of Mt. Puu Ehu using a ratio of 8/6 which is the ratio of wind speeds shown on the verified 50m wind speed map. These speeds were then modeled with the Vestas V47 power curve, air density information and other factors to estimate capacity factor and the seasonal and diurnal power variation. Due to the distant location of the wind data, the information herein is only an indication of pattern and intensity. Data at or near hub height from the proposed site is necessary to give a firm estimate of production. 21 March 2005 9-20 Black & Veatch 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Load (MW)
Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative Renewable Energy Technology Assessments 9.0 Wind Analyses yielded an approximate capacity factor of 34 percent at 50 meters for an annual energy yield of 19 GWh. Figure 9-11 shows power consumption for a Thursday in April 1996 with projected seasonal capacity factors for a 6.6 MW Anahola project. The projected production from this site has a modest afternoon peak in all seasons, somewhat following the load pattern. Wind Capacity Factor 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Winter Fall Spring Summer Load: Thurs. April 4, 1996 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Figure 9-11. Diurnal and Seasonal Capacity Factor with KIUC Summer Loads and Project Output, Anahola Area. 9.6 Cost of Energy 9.6.1 Capital Costs Three general capital cost scenarios were developed: (1) Flat 6.6 MW, (2) Ridge 6.6 MW, and (3) Ridge 2 MW. The first assumed a relatively flat and accessible 6.6 MW project site representing the Kalaheo and Poipu sites. The second assumed a 6.6 MW ridgeline site to represent the Omao, Hanapepe, Anahola, and Maha’ulepu sites. The third scenario assumed a 2 MW ridgeline site to represent the Kokee site. The main difference between the flat and ridgeline costs analyses was that labor costs were 21 March 2005 9-21 Black & Veatch 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Load (MW)
- Page 207 and 208: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 209 and 210: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 211 and 212: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 213 and 214: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 215 and 216: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 217 and 218: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 219 and 220: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 221 and 222: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 223 and 224: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 225 and 226: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 227 and 228: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 229 and 230: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 231 and 232: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 233 and 234: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 235 and 236: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 237 and 238: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 239 and 240: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 241 and 242: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 243 and 244: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 245 and 246: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 247 and 248: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 249 and 250: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 251 and 252: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 253 and 254: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 255 and 256: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 257: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 261 and 262: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 263 and 264: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 265 and 266: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 267 and 268: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 269 and 270: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 271 and 272: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 273 and 274: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 275 and 276: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 277 and 278: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 279 and 280: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 281 and 282: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 283 and 284: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 285 and 286: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 287 and 288: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 289 and 290: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 291 and 292: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 293 and 294: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 295 and 296: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 297 and 298: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
Kaua’i <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> Cooperative<br />
<strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessments</strong> 9.0 Wind<br />
Analyses yielded an approximate capacity factor of 36 percent at 50 meters on the<br />
anemometer site for an annual energy yield of 21 GWh. Figure 9-10 shows power<br />
consumption for a Thursday in April 1996 with projected power production from a 6.6<br />
MW Hanapepe project. Projected output from this ridgeline site has a fairly flat profile<br />
through all seasons.<br />
Wind Capacity Factor<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Winter<br />
Spring<br />
Summer<br />
Fall<br />
Load: Thurs. April 4, 1996<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24<br />
Figure 9-10. Diurnal and Seasonal Capacity Factor with KIUC Summer Loads and<br />
Project Output, Hanapepe Area.<br />
Anahola<br />
Anahola site performance estimates were made using the using 27 m (90 ft)<br />
anemometer data scaled up to 50 meters using a wind sheer factor of 0.1 (appropriate for<br />
ridgline terrain). The data was then further scaled to the better wind on the ridge of Mt.<br />
Puu Ehu using a ratio of 8/6 which is the ratio of wind speeds shown on the verified 50m<br />
wind speed map. These speeds were then modeled with the Vestas V47 power curve, air<br />
density information and other factors to estimate capacity factor and the seasonal and<br />
diurnal power variation. Due to the distant location of the wind data, the information<br />
herein is only an indication of pattern and intensity. Data at or near hub height from the<br />
proposed site is necessary to give a firm estimate of production.<br />
21 March 2005 9-20 Black & Veatch<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Load (MW)