Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ... Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative Renewable Energy Technology Assessments 9.0 Wind nature of the wind resource, power curves should only be used as a general guideline of expected power output. Figure 9-6 shows a representative power curve for a 660 kW Vestas V47 wind turbine. Power (kW) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 5 10 15 Wind Speed (m/s) 20 25 30 Figure 9-6. Vestas V47 Power Curve. There are a number of turbine manufacturers around the globe. Most are from Europe with the largest being Vestas/NEG Micon, Enercon, and Bonus, which was recently purchased by Siemens. The only major US turbine manufacturer is GE Wind. Suzlon is a smaller manufacturer based in India, and Mitsubishi makes turbines in Japan. Manufactures are increasingly focused on developing technology for larger size machines, with many targeting multi-megawatt machines for offshore applications, a major market in Europe. Concerns regarding shipping, transportation, constructability, crane availability, and long term O&M requirements limit the types of turbines that could be reasonably installed on Kauai. A 200 ton crane is currently available in the islands, but in the near term a 300 ton crane may be available from Onipa’a Crane and Rigging on the big island. The current crane availability restricts turbine size in the near term to below 1 MW, but if the 300 ton crane comes available, most commercially available 21 March 2005 9-14 Black & Veatch
Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative Renewable Energy Technology Assessments 9.0 Wind turbines will be an option for Kauai. Use of large turbines may improve performance and cost slightly. There are a variety of factors to consider with respect to constructing a wind project. Simply stated, if the project terrain is too remote or steep, special measures will have to be taken for construction that may increase the capital cost to non-economical levels. The most important factors to consider are ability to set up a large crane for erection of the towers and nacelles and transportation of the towers, nacelles and blades to the project site. The length of a utility-scale wind turbine blade is routinely over 25 meters (80 ft) and they are always shipped in one piece. Access by a suitable road must be considered when siting the project. Projects on Kauai would involve a number of turbines totaling a name plate capacity around 7 MW as agreed with KIUC. Some options include: 10 Vestas V47s for a name plate capacity of 6.6 MW, 7 Bonus 1 MW turbines for 7.0 MW, 20 Suzlon 350 turbines for 7.0 MW, 5 GE 1.5 turbines for 7.5 MW (assuming crane availability), or a number of other options. Final turbine size and manufacturer should be made in consideration of actual wind data for the site, crane availability, cost, and other factors. A Vestas V47 660 kW turbine with a hub height of 50 meters has been used in the analysis herein. A different turbine may be more appropriate, but the V47 will give a reasonable idea of potential since the uncertainty in the available data is greater than any differences between turbines. A taller tower will almost always result in greater power production and should be weighed against constructability, cost, and visual impact. 9.4.3 Project Conceptual Design This section provides a general description of the layout of a project placed on the high and moderate priority sites. A wind plant in the Kalaheo area would likely involve one or two rows of wind turbines situated to the south west of Kalaheo on private lands or near the coast on Alexander & Baldwin land in areas of class 5 winds. The row(s) would be oriented approximately north-south to take advantage of the predominant winds from the east. A central power collection station and step-up transformer would add power directly to a major transmission line. A wind plant in near Anahola, would involve constructing a new road (if one does not exist) onto the windy ridge of Puu Ehu on state land and placement of turbines along the ridge for maximum wind collection. From a common power collection point and transformer, new power lines would bring power to the nearby transmission line. 21 March 2005 9-15 Black & Veatch
- Page 201 and 202: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 203 and 204: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 205 and 206: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 207 and 208: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 209 and 210: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 211 and 212: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 213 and 214: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 215 and 216: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 217 and 218: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 219 and 220: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 221 and 222: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 223 and 224: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 225 and 226: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 227 and 228: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 229 and 230: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 231 and 232: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 233 and 234: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 235 and 236: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 237 and 238: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 239 and 240: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 241 and 242: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 243 and 244: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 245 and 246: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 247 and 248: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 249 and 250: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 251: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 255 and 256: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 257 and 258: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 259 and 260: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 261 and 262: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 263 and 264: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 265 and 266: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 267 and 268: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 269 and 270: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 271 and 272: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 273 and 274: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 275 and 276: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 277 and 278: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 279 and 280: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 281 and 282: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 283 and 284: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 285 and 286: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 287 and 288: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 289 and 290: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 291 and 292: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 293 and 294: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 295 and 296: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 297 and 298: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
Kaua’i <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> Cooperative<br />
<strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessments</strong> 9.0 Wind<br />
turbines will be an option for <strong>Kauai</strong>. Use of large turbines may improve performance and<br />
cost slightly.<br />
There are a variety of factors to consider with respect to constructing a wind<br />
project. Simply stated, if the project terrain is too remote or steep, special measures will<br />
have to be taken for construction that may increase the capital cost to non-economical<br />
levels. The most important factors to consider are ability to set up a large crane for<br />
erection of the towers and nacelles and transportation of the towers, nacelles and blades<br />
to the project site. The length of a utility-scale wind turbine blade is routinely over 25<br />
meters (80 ft) and they are always shipped in one piece. Access by a suitable road must<br />
be considered when siting the project.<br />
Projects on <strong>Kauai</strong> would involve a number of turbines totaling a name plate<br />
capacity around 7 MW as agreed with KIUC. Some options include: 10 Vestas V47s for<br />
a name plate capacity of 6.6 MW, 7 Bonus 1 MW turbines for 7.0 MW, 20 Suzlon 350<br />
turbines for 7.0 MW, 5 GE 1.5 turbines for 7.5 MW (assuming crane availability), or a<br />
number of other options. Final turbine size and manufacturer should be made in<br />
consideration of actual wind data for the site, crane availability, cost, and other factors.<br />
A Vestas V47 660 kW turbine with a hub height of 50 meters has been used in the<br />
analysis herein. A different turbine may be more appropriate, but the V47 will give a<br />
reasonable idea of potential since the uncertainty in the available data is greater than any<br />
differences between turbines. A taller tower will almost always result in greater power<br />
production and should be weighed against constructability, cost, and visual impact.<br />
9.4.3 Project Conceptual Design<br />
This section provides a general description of the layout of a project placed on the<br />
high and moderate priority sites.<br />
A wind plant in the Kalaheo area would likely involve one or two rows of wind<br />
turbines situated to the south west of Kalaheo on private lands or near the coast on<br />
Alexander & Baldwin land in areas of class 5 winds. The row(s) would be oriented<br />
approximately north-south to take advantage of the predominant winds from the east. A<br />
central power collection station and step-up transformer would add power directly to a<br />
major transmission line.<br />
A wind plant in near Anahola, would involve constructing a new road (if one does<br />
not exist) onto the windy ridge of Puu Ehu on state land and placement of turbines along<br />
the ridge for maximum wind collection. From a common power collection point and<br />
transformer, new power lines would bring power to the nearby transmission line.<br />
21 March 2005 9-15 Black & Veatch