Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Kaua’i <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> Cooperative<br />
<strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessments</strong> 5.0 Project Characterizations<br />
project development and start-up expenses (feasibility studies, permitting,<br />
legal, engineering, construction management, spare parts, training, etc.).<br />
5.3 Economic Modeling Approach<br />
Based on the characteristics developed for each project, Black & Veatch<br />
calculated a levelized busbar generation cost ($/MWh). The levelized busbar cost is a<br />
method for comparison of the life-cycle costs of generating power from various projects<br />
on an equal economic basis. This cost considers the project performance, capital cost,<br />
fixed and variable operating costs, and fuel costs (if applicable). The levelized busbar<br />
cost can vary considerably based upon the financing and economic assumptions for a<br />
particular project. To capture the range of possible development scenarios for KIUC, the<br />
levelized cost of developing projects with KIUC financing and developer financing were<br />
considered. Under developer financing the power would be sold to KIUC under a power<br />
purchase agreement (PPA). Therefore, the levelized busbar cost represents the cost of a<br />
levelized price PPA. Developer financing offers the advantage of eligibility for tax-based<br />
federal renewable energy incentives, while KIUC funded projects offer the advantage of<br />
lower financing costs.<br />
5.3.1 Economic Assumptions<br />
The economic assumptions for the KIUC and developer financing scenarios are<br />
provided in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2, respectively. The assumptions are project specific<br />
and vary due to differing project life estimates. These assumptions supercede those in<br />
Table 2-1, which were used for the general technology screening.<br />
Table 5-1. KIUC Financing Assumptions<br />
Hydro Wind LFG Biomass MSW<br />
Debt to Equity Ratio 100 : 0 100 : 0 100 : 0 100 : 0 100 : 0<br />
Cost of Debt, % 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%<br />
Discount Rate, % 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%<br />
Project Life, years 50 25 15 25 25<br />
Debt Term, years 25 25 15 25 25<br />
Fixed O&M Escalation, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%<br />
Variable O&M Escalation, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%<br />
Fuel Cost Escalation, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%<br />
Levelized Fixed Charge Rate, % 5.12% 7.10% 9.63% 7.10% 7.10%<br />
Capacity Credit 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%<br />
21 March 2005 5-4 Black & Veatch