17.07.2013 Views

Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...

Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...

Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kaua’i <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> Cooperative<br />

<strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessments</strong> 5.0 Project Characterizations<br />

project development and start-up expenses (feasibility studies, permitting,<br />

legal, engineering, construction management, spare parts, training, etc.).<br />

5.3 Economic Modeling Approach<br />

Based on the characteristics developed for each project, Black & Veatch<br />

calculated a levelized busbar generation cost ($/MWh). The levelized busbar cost is a<br />

method for comparison of the life-cycle costs of generating power from various projects<br />

on an equal economic basis. This cost considers the project performance, capital cost,<br />

fixed and variable operating costs, and fuel costs (if applicable). The levelized busbar<br />

cost can vary considerably based upon the financing and economic assumptions for a<br />

particular project. To capture the range of possible development scenarios for KIUC, the<br />

levelized cost of developing projects with KIUC financing and developer financing were<br />

considered. Under developer financing the power would be sold to KIUC under a power<br />

purchase agreement (PPA). Therefore, the levelized busbar cost represents the cost of a<br />

levelized price PPA. Developer financing offers the advantage of eligibility for tax-based<br />

federal renewable energy incentives, while KIUC funded projects offer the advantage of<br />

lower financing costs.<br />

5.3.1 Economic Assumptions<br />

The economic assumptions for the KIUC and developer financing scenarios are<br />

provided in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2, respectively. The assumptions are project specific<br />

and vary due to differing project life estimates. These assumptions supercede those in<br />

Table 2-1, which were used for the general technology screening.<br />

Table 5-1. KIUC Financing Assumptions<br />

Hydro Wind LFG Biomass MSW<br />

Debt to Equity Ratio 100 : 0 100 : 0 100 : 0 100 : 0 100 : 0<br />

Cost of Debt, % 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%<br />

Discount Rate, % 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%<br />

Project Life, years 50 25 15 25 25<br />

Debt Term, years 25 25 15 25 25<br />

Fixed O&M Escalation, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%<br />

Variable O&M Escalation, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%<br />

Fuel Cost Escalation, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%<br />

Levelized Fixed Charge Rate, % 5.12% 7.10% 9.63% 7.10% 7.10%<br />

Capacity Credit 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%<br />

21 March 2005 5-4 Black & Veatch

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!