Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Kaua’i <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> Cooperative<br />
<strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessments</strong><br />
4.0 <strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
Screening<br />
4.4.1 Cost of <strong>Energy</strong><br />
The levelized cost of energy is a measure of the total life-cycle cost of a project or<br />
technology to generate power. Because the cost of developing a facility can vary<br />
considerably, even with modular technologies such as solar photovoltaic or wind energy,<br />
a range of project costs and performance assumptions were used to develop levelized cost<br />
estimates for each renewable energy technology. The multi-fuel generation technologies<br />
were evaluated separately as a fuel has not yet been selected for each of these<br />
technologies and the levelized cost of generation is heavily dependent upon the fuel cost.<br />
Black & Veatch used the technology cost and performance assumptions developed in the<br />
previous section, which are summarized in Table 4-3 for the three year timeframe. The<br />
values shown in the table were chosen as representative of the technology application in<br />
<strong>Kauai</strong>.<br />
Of the renewable energy technologies evaluated, wind power has the lowest<br />
capital cost per kW installed at $1,200-1,600/kW. This has resulted in a 30 percent<br />
annual increase in wind installations worldwide over the last five years. System costs<br />
have gone down as single turbines have achieved megawatt sizes. In comparison,<br />
conventional biomass and geothermal technologies have capital costs in the range of<br />
$2,600-3,900/kW and $3,300-5,200/kW, respectively. The high cost of biomass plants<br />
has to do with their relatively small size, extensive fuel and ash handling requirements,<br />
and the need for a robust plant design to handle the variability in the fuel quality.<br />
Geothermal power plant costs and complexity are highly dependent on the temperature of<br />
the geothermal resource, its proximity to the surface and the quality of the brine to be<br />
handled. Due to their extensive material handling and emissions control requirements,<br />
waste to energy technologies have a substantially higher capital cost than biomass plants,<br />
ranging from $6,500 to 11,700/kW. The small size of a potential waste to energy plant in<br />
<strong>Kauai</strong> also increases its relative costs due to economies of scale. Hydroelectric power<br />
plants have a wide range of capital costs from $1,700–5,700/kW. Given the turbine<br />
technology used for power production is quite mature and costs are low, the civil work<br />
that needs to be done to build dams and penstocks tends to be the driving factor behind<br />
the capital cost of these systems. Photovoltaic systems are by far the most expensive<br />
renewable energy technology with capital costs from $8,300–10,500/kW and a capacity<br />
factor of only 20 percent. These systems are currently too expensive to be applied<br />
competitively at utility scale. However, they have found a niche in the remote power<br />
supply market for rural electrification, water supply, and other applications.<br />
21 March 2005 4-5 Black & Veatch