Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ... Renewable Energy Technology Assessments - Kauai Island Utility ...
Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative Renewable Energy Technology Assessments 3.0 Renewable Energy Technology Options Oscillating Water Column devices generate electricity from the wave-induced rise and fall of a water column. The energy in this water column is normally extracted via a moving air column using an air turbine. The main disadvantage with onshore devices is that their construction is very dependent on local conditions and the available wave power is lower at the shoreline; the advantage is that power transmission and maintenance access are much simpler. The most developed example is Wavegen’s 500 kW LIMPET device operating since 2001. Near-shore devices that can often be built around existing breakwater structures include the Energetech device that uses a parabolic wall to focus wave energy onto the collector and a Dennis-Auld turbine. In general, near-shore devices have the advantage that they can access higher wave power without the need for extensive electricity transmission, however (as with onshore devices) their shoreline location may affect their adoption due to their visual appearance. Overtopping tapered channel (TAPCHAN) devices generate electricity using conventional low head hydropower turbines. A tapering channel concentrates and funnels waves up the channel and increases their height so that they then spill into the reservoir. As these are driven by water flowing from a reservoir back to the sea, this device produces a more stable power output. Onshore devices normally need a tidal range of less than 3 feet, deep water near the shore, and a reservoir location. There is a much greater diversity of offshore WECS. The most common offshore WECS are: 1) pneumatic devices, 2) overtopping devices, 3) float-based devices, 4) moving body devices. In general, offshore devices can access the highest wave power, but will require extensive power transmission as well as survivability/maintenance requirements based on a more extreme environment. Pneumatic devices generate electricity using air movement, often using a similar OWC concept to that of shore-based devices. Overtopping devices generate electricity using the same basic methodology as the shore-based versions. Float-based devices generate electricity using the vertical motion of a float rising and falling with each wave. The float motion is reacted against an anchor or other structure so that power can be extracted. Moving body devices use a solid body moving in response to wave action to generate electricity. Float-based devices are the most common of all proposed designs. The welldeveloped European designs that are still under development include the recent combination of the IPS Buoy and the Swedish Hose Pump as the AquaBuOY, for which a 1 MW demonstration plant consisting of four 250kW buoys is planned for 2006 at Makah Bay, WA. A fully submerged device is the Archimedes Wave Swing of which a 2 MW prototype was successfully installed in Portugal in May 2004 and is now undergoing 21 March 2005 3-52 Black & Veatch
Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative Renewable Energy Technology Assessments 3.0 Renewable Energy Technology Options trials. Ocean Power Technologies (OPT) is developing the PowerBuoy device, and the first 50 kW unit of a 1 MW demonstration system was installed in June 2004 off Marine Corps Base Hawaii at Kaneohe Bay, Oahu. Another company that has shown interest in Hawaii is SeaVolt Technologies who have developed the Wave Rider device; this has yet to be demonstrated. Moving body devices use a solid body moving in response to wave action to generate electricity. These are the most complex and sophisticated devices. Several have been under development for many years but few appear close to deployment, with the exception of the Pelamis from Ocean Power Delivery (OPD). The Pelamis is a semisubmerged, articulated structure composed of cylindrical sections linked by hinged joints. Power take-off is via hydraulic rams pumping high-pressure oil through hydraulic motors. A wide variety of tests have been performed including sea trials of a 1:7 model, and a full-scale prototype has been deployed for testing at the European Marine Energy Centre (Scotland). The AquaBuOY, Archimedes Wave Swing, PowerBuoy, and Pelamis devices are shown in Figure 3-12. Figure 3-12. AquaBuOY, Archimedes Wave Swing, PowerBuoy, and Pelamis devices. (Sources: AquaEnergy Group Ltd., AWS BV, Ocean Power Technologies, and Ocean Power Delivery). Costs and Performance Characteristics Since there has not been large-scale commercialization of any of these technologies, there is a very wide range of predicted costs which are based on theoretical calculations and are therefore highly uncertain. Most onshore devices are likely to be based on OWC technology. The costs of onshore OWC can be estimated from the commercial LIMPET device which has forecast electricity costs of around $100/MWh 21 March 2005 3-53 Black & Veatch
- Page 49 and 50: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 51 and 52: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 53 and 54: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 55 and 56: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 57 and 58: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 59 and 60: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 61 and 62: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 63 and 64: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 65 and 66: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 67 and 68: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 69 and 70: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 71 and 72: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 73 and 74: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 75 and 76: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 77 and 78: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 79 and 80: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 81 and 82: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 83 and 84: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 85 and 86: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 87 and 88: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 89 and 90: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 91 and 92: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 93 and 94: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 95 and 96: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 97 and 98: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 99: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 103 and 104: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 105 and 106: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 107 and 108: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 109 and 110: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 111 and 112: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 113 and 114: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 115 and 116: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 117 and 118: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 119 and 120: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 121 and 122: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 123 and 124: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 125 and 126: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 127 and 128: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 129 and 130: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 131 and 132: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 133 and 134: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 135 and 136: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 137 and 138: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 139 and 140: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 141 and 142: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 143 and 144: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 145 and 146: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 147 and 148: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
- Page 149 and 150: Kaua’i Island Utility Cooperative
Kaua’i <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> Cooperative<br />
<strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Assessments</strong><br />
3.0 <strong>Renewable</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />
Options<br />
Oscillating Water Column devices generate electricity from the wave-induced rise<br />
and fall of a water column. The energy in this water column is normally extracted via a<br />
moving air column using an air turbine. The main disadvantage with onshore devices is<br />
that their construction is very dependent on local conditions and the available wave<br />
power is lower at the shoreline; the advantage is that power transmission and<br />
maintenance access are much simpler. The most developed example is Wavegen’s<br />
500 kW LIMPET device operating since 2001.<br />
Near-shore devices that can often be built around existing breakwater structures<br />
include the Energetech device that uses a parabolic wall to focus wave energy onto the<br />
collector and a Dennis-Auld turbine. In general, near-shore devices have the advantage<br />
that they can access higher wave power without the need for extensive electricity<br />
transmission, however (as with onshore devices) their shoreline location may affect their<br />
adoption due to their visual appearance.<br />
Overtopping tapered channel (TAPCHAN) devices generate electricity using<br />
conventional low head hydropower turbines. A tapering channel concentrates and<br />
funnels waves up the channel and increases their height so that they then spill into the<br />
reservoir. As these are driven by water flowing from a reservoir back to the sea, this<br />
device produces a more stable power output. Onshore devices normally need a tidal<br />
range of less than 3 feet, deep water near the shore, and a reservoir location.<br />
There is a much greater diversity of offshore WECS. The most common offshore<br />
WECS are: 1) pneumatic devices, 2) overtopping devices, 3) float-based devices, 4)<br />
moving body devices. In general, offshore devices can access the highest wave power,<br />
but will require extensive power transmission as well as survivability/maintenance<br />
requirements based on a more extreme environment.<br />
Pneumatic devices generate electricity using air movement, often using a similar<br />
OWC concept to that of shore-based devices. Overtopping devices generate electricity<br />
using the same basic methodology as the shore-based versions. Float-based devices<br />
generate electricity using the vertical motion of a float rising and falling with each wave.<br />
The float motion is reacted against an anchor or other structure so that power can be<br />
extracted. Moving body devices use a solid body moving in response to wave action to<br />
generate electricity.<br />
Float-based devices are the most common of all proposed designs. The welldeveloped<br />
European designs that are still under development include the recent<br />
combination of the IPS Buoy and the Swedish Hose Pump as the AquaBuOY, for which a<br />
1 MW demonstration plant consisting of four 250kW buoys is planned for 2006 at Makah<br />
Bay, WA. A fully submerged device is the Archimedes Wave Swing of which a 2 MW<br />
prototype was successfully installed in Portugal in May 2004 and is now undergoing<br />
21 March 2005 3-52 Black & Veatch