16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3-01<br />

Damage Spectrum of DNA Strand Break Termini<br />

Induced by 4 He 2+ Ion Beam Compared with that<br />

by 60 Co -rays<br />

K. Akamatsu and K. Saito<br />

Division of Environment and Radiation Sciences, NSED, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />

1. Introduction<br />

Chemical structures of DNA lesions and their<br />

distribution are quite important to clarify following<br />

biological repair procedures. In case of ionizing radiations,<br />

especially, it is expected that three-dimensional distribution<br />

of DNA damages is diversified as well as their chemical<br />

structures, and the diversity makes investigations of<br />

physicochemical processes in radiation effects difficult. In<br />

fact, double-strand breaks produced by high linear energy<br />

transfer (LET) alpha particles are more difficult to rejoin in<br />

living cells than those produced by low LET 137 1)<br />

Cs -rays .<br />

So far, we have investigated difference of DNA damage<br />

spectrum between radiations using existing and/or newly<br />

developed analytical method 2) . Here, we reveal the results<br />

of strand break termini induced by 4 He 2+ (He) ion beam in<br />

comparison with that by 60 Co -rays (7cell, Takasaki). The<br />

ion beam used was obtained from TC in TIARA.<br />

2. Experiments<br />

Sample preparation and irradiation<br />

Linear formed pUC19 plasmid DNA digested by Sma I,<br />

(pUC19/Sma I) was used. pUC19/Sma I aqueous solution<br />

was mounted on a silicon plate and dried thoroughly in<br />

vacuum under P 2O 5. For -irradiation, the dried DNA<br />

sample on a plate was put into a glass tube sealed in vacuum<br />

to achieve secondary electron equilibrium. Each sample<br />

was irradiated at a dose (dose rate) of 40 (0.333), 100<br />

(0.833), 400 (3.33), 900 (7.50), and 1,800 kGy (15.0 kGy/h)<br />

at r.t., respectively. For He ion beam, the DNA- mounted<br />

plate was fixed in a cylindrical chamber (39 mm, height:<br />

22 mm) with a Kapton ® window (8 m) under argon gas.<br />

Each sample was irradiated with ~ 67 keV/m of the beam,<br />

which was controlled using a depth-tunable cell irradiation<br />

equipment, was irradiated at doses of 50, 100, 200, 400, and<br />

Fig. 1 Protocol for quantification of DNA strand<br />

break termini with phosphate.<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

- 57 -<br />

Table 1 Spectra of strand break termini in DNA<br />

irradiated with 4 He 2+ ion beam and 60 Co -rays.<br />

900 kGy at r.t.. The irradiated DNA samples were<br />

recovered by water at 0 °C. The aqueous solutions were<br />

lyophilized and kept at -20 °C until use.<br />

Analytical methods<br />

To obtain strand break terminal spectra, SVPD method 2)<br />

and terminal phosphate analysis method 3) were used. The<br />

latter protocol was illustrated in Fig. 1. This method is<br />

bases on a known quantification technique of free phosphate<br />

using colorimetry of malachite green. As CIAP can<br />

hydrolyze terminal phosphate groups both at 3’ and 5’ ends,<br />

all strand break termini with phosphate can be quantified by<br />

the method in principle.<br />

3. Results and Discussion<br />

The results of these analyses of DNA irradiated with He<br />

ion beam and 60 Co -rays are summarized in Table 1 (3’X<br />

means 3’termini neither with OH nor phosphate). At a<br />

glance, the yields of all categorized termini for He ion beam<br />

were around 2-3 times larger than those for -rays except for<br />

the yields for 3’OH. This result suggests that high-LET<br />

radiation such as He ion beam is likely to decompose sugar<br />

moieties in DNA compared with low-LET one at least in<br />

case of the direct radiation effects.<br />

4. Acknowledgments<br />

We would like to gratefully thank Dr. Y. Sugo for<br />

operating the TC line, and also thank Drs. M. Kikuchi and<br />

Y. Kobayashi for -ray irradiation experiments.<br />

References<br />

1) C. M. deLala et al., Radiat. Res. 144 (1995) 43.<br />

2) K. Akamatsu, Anal. Biochem. 362 (2007) 22.<br />

3) K. Akamatsu, Radiat. Chem. 89 (<strong>2010</strong>) 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!