16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1-23<br />

Studies on Microstructure and Elemental Distributions<br />

of Barrier Materials for Geological Disposal of<br />

Radioactive Waste<br />

N. Miyasaka a) , K. Yoshi a) , T. Kozaki b) , S. Sato b) , N. Kozai c) , M. Kohka d) ,<br />

T. Satoh d) and T. Kamiya d)<br />

a) Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, b) Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido<br />

University, c) Advanced Science Research Center, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />

d) Department of Advanced Radiation Technology, TARRI, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />

A compacted Na-bentonite, of which major mineral is<br />

montmorillonite having high swelling ability and low<br />

hydraulic conductivity, is a candidate buffer material in<br />

geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste.<br />

However, Na-bentonite would change if its exchangeable<br />

cations of Na + are replaced with Fe 2+ which can be released<br />

from corrosion of carbon steel waste containers. Therefore,<br />

the performance as the buffer should be evaluated in a<br />

proper way not only for Na-bentonite but also for<br />

Fe(II)-bentonite. In a hydraulic conductivity measurement<br />

for Fe(II)-bentonite, Fe 2+ in the sample are easily oxidized<br />

and precipitated under the presence of oxygen. Similarly,<br />

some fraction of Fe 2+ in the sample may be precipitated as a<br />

result of hydrolysis if the sample is kept contact with fresh<br />

water for long time. Therefore, the stability of<br />

Fe(II)-bentonite during the measurement is a key issue to be<br />

studied so as to evaluate its hydraulic conductivity. In this<br />

study, Fe(II)-montmorillonite before and after the hydraulic<br />

conductivity measurements were characterized by chemical<br />

analyses. In addition, a micro-PIXE analysis was<br />

conducted for the samples to find the precipitation of iron in<br />

the samples.<br />

The Fe(II)-montmorillonite was prepared from<br />

Na-montmorillonite by a modified ion-exchange reaction<br />

using Fe(II)-nitrilotriacetate complex solution. Total<br />

amounts of exchangeable cations in the samples before and<br />

after the hydraulic conductivity measurement were<br />

determined by ICP-AES after extracted with 0.1 M KCl<br />

solution. The ratios of Fe(II) to total Fe extracted from the<br />

samples were determined by colorimetry. Detail<br />

procedures of the chemical analyses are described<br />

1)<br />

elsewhere . The samples for micro-PIXE analyses were<br />

prepared by drying the suspension of the sample which had<br />

been dropped on a graphite plate. The hydraulic<br />

conductivity measurements by constant head method were<br />

conducted at dry densities of 0.8 and 1.0 Mg m -3 for about<br />

30 days under a room temperature. Amount of distilled<br />

water passed through the sample during the experiment was<br />

3.6 × 10-5 m 3 and 2.5 × 10-6 m 3 per 1 g-clay at dry densities<br />

of 0.8 and 1.0 Mg m -3 , respectively. The samples were<br />

handled under oxygen-free condition except a moment to set<br />

the sample on a sample holder of the micro-PIXE system.<br />

Table 1 shows the results of chemical analyses for Fe(II)-<br />

sample before and after the hydraulic conductivity<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

- 27 -<br />

measurement at the dry density of 0.8 Mg m -3 . Although<br />

no oxidation of Fe(II) occurred, Fe content was found to<br />

decrease during the measurement. Figure 1 shows<br />

two-dimensional elemental mappings of Si, Al and Fe for<br />

the Fe(II)-sample after the hydraulic conductivity<br />

measurement. The region where only Fe has high content<br />

(as indicated with circles in the figure) appeared after the<br />

hydraulic conductivity measurement. These findings<br />

suggest that small fraction of Fe(II) ions in the Fe(II)-sample<br />

are precipitated between montmorillonite particles during<br />

the measurement.<br />

In general, Fe 2+ ions precipitated in micro pores may<br />

reduce the hydraulic conductivity, whereas Fe 2+ ions<br />

precipitated over montmorillonite particles may inhibit their<br />

swelling, resulting in high hydraulic conductivity.<br />

However, the hydraulic conductivities observed were kept<br />

constant during the whole period of the measurement at both<br />

dry densities. This suggests that at least small amount of<br />

the precipitation has no or negligibly small impact on the<br />

hydraulic conductivity.<br />

Reference<br />

1) J. Manjanna et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 44 (2007) 929.<br />

Table 1 Exchangeable cations and Fe(II)/Fe(total) ratio<br />

of Fe extracted from Fe(II)-samples before and after<br />

hydraulic conductivity measurement at dry density of<br />

0.8 Mg m -3 .<br />

Exchangeable cation [meq/100g] Fe(II)/Fe(total)<br />

Na Ca Fe [%]<br />

Before 3 2 101 100<br />

After 1 3 92 100<br />

Fig. 1 Two-dimensional elemental mappings of Si, Al and<br />

Fe for Fe(II)-sample after hydraulic conductivity<br />

measurement at dry density of 0.8 Mg m -3 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!